The goal of this proposal is to explain how diverse innate immune response pathways can be activated by a single microbial product: bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). While TLR4 is widely recognized to control transcriptional responses to LPS, TLR4-independent responses exist. Examples of such responses include endocytosis, activation of the transcription factor NFAT, and activation of non-canonical inflammasomes by caspase-11. The relationship between these diverse LPS responses is largely unknown, but as we will describe, at least some TLR4-independent responses control the classically-defined TLR4-dependent responses to LPS. Understanding how microbial products activate distinct signal transduction pathways may permit the design of drugs or vaccines that can target a subset of pathways therapeutically. Our proposal is founded on our recent discovery that LPS-induces the endocytosis of TLR4 by a process that does not require a functional TLR4 signaling (TIR) domain, or any of its associated adaptor proteins. Rather TLR4 is cargo for an endocytosis pathway that is activated by the LPS-binding protein CD14. While TLR4 does not direct its own endocytosis, this process is essential for TLR4 to induce TRIF-dependent signal transduction from endosomes. This discovery provides an example of how TLR4-dependent and -independent responses to LPS can be interdependent. In this grant application, we propose to 1) determine if a common signaling pathway is activated by CD14 to elicit diverse cell type-specific innate immune responses, 2) determine if common or distinct protein complexes exist that regulate diverse LPS inducible signaling pathways, and 3) identify the cell populations that directly respond to LPS produced by pathogenic bacterial infections in animal models of infection. Collectively, this work will provide important insight into the means by which diverse cellular responses to LPS are interconnected.
The collateral tissue damage that results from an immune response can cause life-threatening maladies that are sometimes more dangerous than the infection itself. Our research proposal sets out to understand the means by which an immune response is set into motion. By focusing our work on the earliest triggers of immune activation (the detection of microbes) we may unravel new means by which we can control the activation or in-activation of immunity.
|Odendall, Charlotte; Kagan, Jonathan C (2015) The unique regulation and functions of type III interferons in antiviral immunity. Curr Opin Virol 12:47-52|
|Rosadini, Charles V; Zanoni, Ivan; Odendall, Charlotte et al. (2015) A Single Bacterial Immune Evasion Strategy Dismantles Both MyD88 and TRIF Signaling Pathways Downstream of TLR4. Cell Host Microbe 18:682-93|
|Tan, Yunhao; Zanoni, Ivan; Cullen, Thomas W et al. (2015) Mechanisms of Toll-like Receptor 4 Endocytosis Reveal a Common Immune-Evasion Strategy Used by Pathogenic and Commensal Bacteria. Immunity 43:909-22|
|Rosadini, Charles V; Kagan, Jonathan C (2015) Microbial strategies for antagonizing Toll-like-receptor signal transduction. Curr Opin Immunol 32:61-70|
|Chow, Jonathan; Franz, Kate M; Kagan, Jonathan C (2015) PRRs are watching you: Localization of innate sensing and signaling regulators. Virology 479-480:104-9|
|Kagan, Jonathan C; Magupalli, Venkat Giri; Wu, Hao (2014) SMOCs: supramolecular organizing centres that control innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 14:821-6|
|Kagan, Jonathan C (2014) Common mechanisms activate plant guard receptors and TLR4. Trends Immunol 35:454-6|