This application addresses broad Challenge Area (01) Behavior, Behavioral Change, and Prevention and specific Challenge Topic, 01-GM-104: Mechanisms of Behavior Change Research. Disclosing the prospect or discovery of genomic IFs to clinical patients or prospective research subjects is an area fraught with ethical, legal, social, and practical challenges. These challenges are being magnified with the advent of Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA). The potential for identifying IFs and how this potential should be addressed for GWAS, CMA, and other genomic research and clinical applications is a novel prospect with which researchers, clinicians, research subjects, patients, and policy makers have limited experience. The Purpose of this research is to examine how the prospect of IFs is addressed in the context of GWAS and CMA, and to identify key areas for future research and consideration in the longer-term effort to promote ethically, legally, and socially sound policies and best practices for the management of genomic IFs.
The Specific Aims of the research project are to: 1) examine how the prospect of genomic IFs is currently articulated in patient education and informed consent materials in research and related clinical application;2) determine how the issues surrounding genomic IFs are defined and how they would preferably be handled from the perspectives of: a) health professionals, including clinicians working with genomic technologies and investigators conducting genomic research;b) IRBs, including IRB Chairs potentially involved in the review of genomic protocols or protocols making use of genomic tools such as CMA;and c) diverse members of the public, including representatives of different ethnic, cultural and religious groups, and parents of children who have had CMA testing;3) synthesize data from Aims 1 and 2 into a model taxonomy of genomic IF issues and stakeholder preferences and perceptions that has the potential to support decisions regarding disclosure and discovery of IFs in genomic testing and research;and, 4) disseminate the taxonomy to stakeholder groups for their assessment of its utility in weighing factors affecting decisions regarding disclosure of IFs in genomic testing and their identification of priorities relevant to issues surrounding IFs in genomic research and clinical practice. Data will be obtained and analyzed from surveys and interview with researchers using GWAS, clinicians using CMA, and a cross section of public stakeholders. Baseline data here will be highly valuable in terms of identifying possible trends and gaps in upfront disclosure of genomic IFs, and will serve as a baseline for recommendations concerning future research and practice guidelines in this area. This research study will be among the first to explore the prospect and discovery of IFs in GWAS and CMA, to generate a taxonomy with the potential to support decision making related to the prospect and discovery of genomic IFs, and to identify opportunities for future research and dialogue in this important area of ethical concern. Laboratory tests designed to determine if there is a genetic cause for a disease or health problem can sometimes have other abnormal findings. Currently, there are not guidelines for how to inform people of this possibility or to determine when and how people would want to learn this information. The preferences of people who have these tests and their physicians who order them for clinical diagnosis or research purposes are needed to establish policies on informing people of the possibility and management of these unanticipated findings.

Public Health Relevance

Laboratory tests designed to determine if there is a genetic cause for a disease or health problem can sometimes have other abnormal findings. Currently, there are not guidelines for how to inform people of this possibility or to determine when and how people would want to learn this information. The preferences of people who have these tests and their physicians who order them for clinical diagnosis or research purposes are needed to establish policies on informing people of the possibility and management of these unanticipated findings.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)
Type
NIH Challenge Grants and Partnerships Program (RC1)
Project #
1RC1HG005786-01
Application #
7814326
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-HDM-P (58))
Program Officer
Thomson, Elizabeth
Project Start
2009-09-30
Project End
2011-07-31
Budget Start
2009-09-30
Budget End
2010-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2009
Total Cost
$427,275
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Iowa
Department
Type
Schools of Nursing
DUNS #
062761671
City
Iowa City
State
IA
Country
United States
Zip Code
52242
Williams, Janet K; Daack-Hirsch, Sandra; Driessnack, Martha et al. (2013) The importance of patient engagement. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 17:649
Brandt, Debra S; Shinkunas, Laura; Hillis, Stephen L et al. (2013) A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs. J Genet Couns 22:544-53
Daack-Hirsch, S; Driessnack, M; Hanish, A et al. (2013) 'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing. Clin Genet 84:11-8
Downing, Nancy R; Williams, Janet K; Daack-Hirsch, Sandra et al. (2013) Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting. Patient Educ Couns 90:133-8
Simon, Christian; Shinkunas, Laura A; Brandt, Debra et al. (2012) Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance. J Med Ethics 38:417-22
Williams, Janet K; Daack-Hirsch, Sandra; Driessnack, Martha et al. (2012) Researcher and institutional review board chair perspectives on incidental findings in genomic research. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 16:508-13
Simon, Christian M; Williams, Janet K; Shinkunas, Laura et al. (2011) Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 6:53-67