The primary goal of this project is to evaluate, through phase II randomized clinical trials for brain, head and neck, lung and liver cancers, the effectiveness of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) relative to intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (commonly referred to as IMRT). The overall long-term goal and the expected outcome ofthe proposed research is the development of proton therapy strategies which maximally exploit the physical as well as biological properties of protons to improve clinical outcomes. The common theme ofthe proposed trials is acute and late toxicity reduction, quality of life (QOL) improvement and, potentially, improvement in local control and survival. This project supports the mission ofthe NCI to improve the treatment and continuing care of cancer patients.
This research aims to improve radiation treatment for cancer patients by improving our ability to direct the radiation at the tumor to spare adjacent normal tissue by using protons (charged particles) with intensity-modulated proton therapy. This can potentially improve cancer cure rates, reduce side effects, or both, depending on the clinical scenario. With an increasing number of proton centers in the United States and abroad, the research in this program is increasingly important for public health.
|Niedzielski, Joshua S; Yang, Jinzhong; Liao, Zhongxing et al. (2016) (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Can Quantify and Predict Esophageal Injury During Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:670-8|
|Gunn, G Brandon; Blanchard, Pierre; Garden, Adam S et al. (2016) Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:360-7|
|Hall, David C; Makarova, Anastasia; Paganetti, Harald et al. (2016) Validation of nuclear models in Geant4 using the dose distribution of a 177 MeV proton pencil beam. Phys Med Biol 61:N1-N10|
|Unkelbach, Jan; Botas, Pablo; Giantsoudi, Drosoula et al. (2016) Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:1097-1106|
|Niedzielski, Joshua S; Yang, Jinzhong; Stingo, Francesco et al. (2016) Objectively Quantifying Radiation Esophagitis With Novel Computed Tomography-Based Metrics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94:385-93|
|Wang, Xin Shelley; Shi, Qiuling; Williams, Loretta A et al. (2016) Prospective Study of Patient-Reported Symptom Burden in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Proton or Photon Chemoradiation Therapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 51:832-8|
|Underwood, Tracy; Paganetti, Harald (2016) Variable Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness: How Do We Move Forward? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:56-8|
|Unkelbach, Jan; BussiÃ¨re, Marc R; Chapman, Paul H et al. (2016) Spatiotemporal Fractionation Schemes for Irradiating Large Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1067-74|
|Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2016) Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:242-8|
|Peeler, Christopher R; Mirkovic, Dragan; Titt, Uwe et al. (2016) Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. Radiother Oncol :|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 15 publications