The goal of this project is to assess and improve our understanding of the magnitude and clinical impact of (a) assumptions and approximations of current proton therapy regarding the physical interactions of protons with patient anatomy and treatment devices, (b) the markedly different dose distribution patterns of protons and photons, and (c) the assumption of the variability of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons compared to the current practice of using a constant RBE of 1.1. This goal will be accomplished partly through the analyses of clinical data (local control, toxicities and imaged response) from the P01 clinical trials and partly through computer simulations and through in-vivo experiments. Achieving this goal is of high significance in that the knowledge gained about the factors affecting treatment response (e.g., inter- and intra-fractional anatomic variations, approximations in predicting physical dose, RBE variability, etc.) would be critical for making reliable treatment decisions about the appropriateness of proton therapy, for correctly evaluating the clinical effectiveness of planned proton dose distributions, and for developing advanced methods to design optimum and robust IMPT to exploit the full potential of proton therapy. This project supports the mission of the NCI to improve the treatment and continuing care of cancer patients.
This research aims to improve radiation treatment for cancer patients by improving our ability to direct the radiation at the tumor to spare adjacent normal tissue by using protons (charged particles) with intensity- modulated proton therapy. This can potentially improve cancer cure rates, reduce side effects, or both, depending on the clinical scenario. With an increasing number of proton centers in the United States and abroad the research in this program project is increasingly important for public health.
|Niedzielski, Joshua S; Yang, Jinzhong; Liao, Zhongxing et al. (2016) (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Can Quantify and Predict Esophageal Injury During Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:670-8|
|Gunn, G Brandon; Blanchard, Pierre; Garden, Adam S et al. (2016) Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Disease Recurrence After Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:360-7|
|Hall, David C; Makarova, Anastasia; Paganetti, Harald et al. (2016) Validation of nuclear models in Geant4 using the dose distribution of a 177 MeV proton pencil beam. Phys Med Biol 61:N1-N10|
|Unkelbach, Jan; Botas, Pablo; Giantsoudi, Drosoula et al. (2016) Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:1097-1106|
|Niedzielski, Joshua S; Yang, Jinzhong; Stingo, Francesco et al. (2016) Objectively Quantifying Radiation Esophagitis With Novel Computed Tomography-Based Metrics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94:385-93|
|Wang, Xin Shelley; Shi, Qiuling; Williams, Loretta A et al. (2016) Prospective Study of Patient-Reported Symptom Burden in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Proton or Photon Chemoradiation Therapy. J Pain Symptom Manage 51:832-8|
|Underwood, Tracy; Paganetti, Harald (2016) Variable Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness: How Do We Move Forward? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:56-8|
|Unkelbach, Jan; BussiÃ¨re, Marc R; Chapman, Paul H et al. (2016) Spatiotemporal Fractionation Schemes for Irradiating Large Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1067-74|
|Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2016) Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:242-8|
|Peeler, Christopher R; Mirkovic, Dragan; Titt, Uwe et al. (2016) Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma. Radiother Oncol :|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 15 publications