Despite the fact that surveillance is a well-recognized public health tool, the capability for cancer surveillance in the U.S. is limited. A more robust U.. cancer screening surveillance system would capture data on cancer screening utilization that was linked with: outcome data from cancer registries, patient demographic and risk factor information, and electronic health records of use to patients and providers. This project will assess the feasibility and utility of implementing a national screening surveillance system for screening-amenable cancers (cervical, breast and colorectal cancer). An environmental scan to identify screening programs (both cancer and non-cancer) will be conducted to guide the process of inquiry. In keeping with the CDC's Framework for Evaluation, stakeholders will play a key role in this formative evaluation project. Stakeholders will represent various entities who would be involved in the planning (directors of state chronic disease and prevention services departments), development (health informatics, electronic health record vendors), data collection (screening providers, primary care providers) and/or end-use (providers, insurers, public health professionals, researchers) of a screening surveillance system. Mixed methods will be used to gather data from up to 150 stakeholders through key informant interviews, focus groups, and a modified Delphi process for expert consensus. The credibility and utility of this information will be supported through input from an Advisory Board, representing key stakeholder groups. Information gleaned from this assessment will result in recommendations for implementing a national cancer screening surveillance system, which will be disseminated not only in a peer-reviewed publication but channels recommended by stakeholders. Assuring that the recommendations incorporate viewpoints from diverse stakeholders, as proposed for this project, will increase the likelihood that a national system will be implemented and will maximize its utility and long-term sustainability.

Public Health Relevance

This project will assess the feasibility and utility of implementing a national screening surveillance system for screening-amenable cancers (cervical, breast and colorectal cancer) with input from various stakeholders across the U.S. A national surveillance system would greatly enhance our ability to evaluate the reach, quality and effectiveness of cancer screening, as well as facilitate delivery of targeted interventions to improve screening rates and adherence to follow-up care in order to optimize the benefits of screening on a population level.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Center for Chronic Disease Prev and Health Promo (NCCDPHP)
Type
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research Centers (U48)
Project #
3U48DP001938-05S1
Application #
8642524
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDP1-EEO (7A))
Project Start
2009-09-30
Project End
2014-09-29
Budget Start
2013-09-30
Budget End
2014-09-29
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$1,230,162
Indirect Cost
$318,411
Name
University of Colorado Denver
Department
Public Health & Prev Medicine
Type
Schools of Public Health
DUNS #
041096314
City
Aurora
State
CO
Country
United States
Zip Code
80045
O'Leary, Sean T; Hurley, Laura P; Kennedy, Erin D et al. (2016) Provider Attitudes Regarding Vaccine Tracking Systems in Pediatric Practices. Acad Pediatr 16:34-41
Hurley, Laura P; Bridges, Carolyn B; Harpaz, Rafael et al. (2016) Physician Attitudes Toward Adult Vaccines and Other Preventive Practices, United States, 2012. Public Health Rep 131:320-30
Escoffery, Cam; Hannon, Peggy; Maxwell, Annette E et al. (2015) Assessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S. BMC Public Health 15:49
Litt, Jill; Varda, Danielle; Reed, Hannah et al. (2015) How to Identify Success Among Networks That Promote Active Living. Am J Public Health 105:2298-305
Friedman, Daniela B; Becofsky, Katie; Anderson, Lynda A et al. (2015) Public perceptions about risk and protective factors for cognitive health and impairment: a review of the literature. Int Psychogeriatr 27:1263-75
Hagstrom, Erika L; Patel, Shivani; Karimkhani, Chante et al. (2015) Comparing cutaneous research funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the US skin disease burden. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:383-91.e1
Goins, R Turner; Jones, Jacqueline; Schure, Marc et al. (2015) Older Adults' Perceptions of Mobility: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Studies. Gerontologist 55:929-42
Kempe, Allison; O'Leary, Sean T; Kennedy, Allison et al. (2015) Physician response to parental requests to spread out the recommended vaccine schedule. Pediatrics 135:666-77
Escoffery, Cam; Fernandez, Maria E; Vernon, Sally W et al. (2015) Patient Navigation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. J Public Health Manag Pract 21:433-40
Cole, Allison M; Tu, Shin-Ping; Fernandez, Maria E et al. (2015) Reported Use of Electronic Health Records to Implement Evidence Based Approaches to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 26:1235-45

Showing the most recent 10 out of 33 publications