Research Core Facilities Rationale and Organization. We propose 3 core facilities (2 continuing and 1 new): 1) Cell Culture, 2) Microscopy and 3) Computation and Bioinformatics. Cell Culture and Microscope Cores are located in adjacent labs to provide seamless transition from cell culture to microscopy. All core facilities are for the exclusive use of Center members. CORE A: Cell Culture The essential role of this core is to standardize every aspect of the cell culture system to maximize efficiency, consistency, and accessibility. It will serve as a repository for all cell lines, vectors, and reagents (media, supplements, basement membrane extract). Dr. Lourdes Estrada will be the core PI, and daily operations will be performed by two staff with dedicated effort. CORE B: Microscopy This Core will run and maintain the adjacently located HCAM system and LSM 510 Scanning Confocal Microscope, provide general oversight of equipment, coordinate the scheduling of users, provide expertise and in depth training, and help ensure that Center members can efficiently generate necessary data for models models. Dr. Darren Tyson, an expert in advanced imaging technology, will be responsible for the operations. BD Pathway 855 Bioimager - The Bioimager is capable of imaging an entire 96-well microplate in a single channel and focal plane in ~8 min. Imaging can also be performed repeatedly with multiple images per well, multiple focal planes (z-sections), and using multiple fluorescent channels. In addition, automated liquid handling allows for drug treatments, with precise control of duration and volume. This machine has adaptable hardware that directly integrated with OME to expedite downstream processing of image data. Scanning Confocal Imaging System (LSM5 #28 405/AR+2HENE/3PMT 3.5) - This system is used for high-resolution image capturing particularly for 3D cultures. Its features include: the latest operating system and hardware, faster 3D rendering, a 405 nm """"""""UV-like"""""""" laser for DAPI and Hoechst, FRAP capability for photobleaching, photoactivation, and workstations for image processing. CORE C: Computational and Bioinformatics The Center needs for high-performance computing are three-fold: 1) implementation of computational models;2) acquisition of high-throughput quantitative cellular phenotypic parameters (at the single-cell level);and 3) image data usability via extensive annotation, processing and online databases.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
5U54CA113007-09
Application #
8449527
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRLB-C)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-03-01
Budget End
2014-02-28
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$134,865
Indirect Cost
$20,491
Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
004413456
City
Nashville
State
TN
Country
United States
Zip Code
37212
Hardeman, Keisha N; Peng, Chengwei; Paudel, Bishal B et al. (2017) Dependence On Glycolysis Sensitizes BRAF-mutated Melanomas For Increased Response To Targeted BRAF Inhibition. Sci Rep 7:42604
Wooten, David J; Quaranta, Vito (2017) Mathematical models of cell phenotype regulation and reprogramming: Make cancer cells sensitive again! Biochim Biophys Acta 1867:167-175
Udyavar, Akshata R; Wooten, David J; Hoeksema, Megan et al. (2017) Novel Hybrid Phenotype Revealed in Small Cell Lung Cancer by a Transcription Factor Network Model That Can Explain Tumor Heterogeneity. Cancer Res 77:1063-1074
Harris, Leonard A; Frick, Peter L; Garbett, Shawn P et al. (2016) An unbiased metric of antiproliferative drug effect in vitro. Nat Methods 13:497-500
Franco, Omar E; Tyson, Darren R; Konvinse, Katherine C et al. (2016) Altered TGF-?/? signaling drives cooperation between breast cancer cell populations. FASEB J 30:3441-3452
Werner, Benjamin; Scott, Jacob G; Sottoriva, Andrea et al. (2016) The Cancer Stem Cell Fraction in Hierarchically Organized Tumors Can Be Estimated Using Mathematical Modeling and Patient-Specific Treatment Trajectories. Cancer Res 76:1705-13
Gerlee, Philip; Kim, Eunjung; Anderson, Alexander R A (2015) Bridging scales in cancer progression: mapping genotype to phenotype using neural networks. Semin Cancer Biol 30:30-41
Frick, Peter L; Paudel, Bishal B; Tyson, Darren R et al. (2015) Quantifying heterogeneity and dynamics of clonal fitness in response to perturbation. J Cell Physiol 230:1403-12
Nichol, Daniel; Jeavons, Peter; Fletcher, Alexander G et al. (2015) Steering Evolution with Sequential Therapy to Prevent the Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004493
Broussard, Joshua A; Diggins, Nicole L; Hummel, Stephen et al. (2015) Automated analysis of cell-matrix adhesions in 2D and 3D environments. Sci Rep 5:8124

Showing the most recent 10 out of 89 publications