Understanding the mechanisms of an effective neutralizing antibody response to HIV is one of the highest priorities in the field of HIV-specific immunity. In this regard, the inability of the humoral response of most vaccinees to cross-neutralize multiple strains of HIV is believed to be a major obstacle to the design of effective vaccines. In 2006 we observed that sera from subpopulation of our chronically-infected cohorts had considerable neutralization breadth extending across clades. Much of the work done prior to that time had not focused on patients selected for broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies to HIV-1. In addition, a relatively small number of monoclonal neutralizing antibodies existed at the time. For these reasons we began to recruit a cohort of individuals screened for broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies to HIV. We, in collaboration with John Mascola at the Vaccine Research Center (VRC), used these sera to systematically dissect the means by which these patients cross-neutralize. We thus far have identified 30 such patients and are continuing to accrue additional subjects. A number of fundamental questions had not been addressed with regard to the HIV-specific humoral immune response of these patients. For example, it was not known if these patients had genetic or clinical characteristics, or HIV-specific cellular immune response characteristics in common. It was also not known whether neutralization was mediated by a few B cell clones directed to conserved epitopes or by an extremely polyclonal response to many epitopes. Given that our patients are infected with clade B viruses and should not have experienced infection by viruses belonging to multiple clades, we hypothesized that cross-neutralization is mediated through conserved epitopes on HIV envelope. In addition, although considerable work had been done on patient sera, very little had been done on HIV-specific B cells. The phenotype and immunoglobulin class of HIV-specific B cells in comparison to responses to other viruses remained poorly defined. Further, it remained unclear whether patients with broad cross-neutralizing activity are unique with regard to these parameters. One primary objective of our work on the humoral response to HIV is to understand the basis of a broadly cross-neutralizing antibody response in our patients. It was not known whether there are common features of the humoral response of such patients with regard to specificity. It was also not known whether neutralization was mediated by a few B cell clones directed to conserved epitopes or by an extremely polyclonal response to many epitopes. To understand the specificity and diversity of epitopes targeted by the B-cell response in patients with broad sera, we have initiated a collaborative effort to isolate monoclonal antibodies. This work has resulted in several publications using the targeted strategy of isolating monoclonal antibodies from sorted gp140-labelled B-cells. Collaborators at Rockefeller University have observed that gp140-labelled B-cells contain numerous clones with some neutralizing activity that may have an additive effect to produce breadth. However, individual monoclonal antibodies with extraordinary potency and breadth have been isolated in our laboratory or at the VRC. One of these monoclonals, named VRC01, is a very broad and potent antibody that binds the CD4 binding site of the HIV envelope protein. At the time, the isolation of monoclonal antibodies from cells of chronically infected patients was providing considerable advances in understanding the specificities and mechanisms underlying broadly neutralizing antibody responses to HIV-1. However, one limitation to the methods employed is that they used protein probes to isolate B cells which required prior knowledge of the specificity of the antibodies that are being sought. To further understand the specificities and binding characteristics that underlie a broadly neutralizing antibody response we recently developed techniques that permitted isolation of human monoclonal antibodies without previous knowledge of specificity. In this technique peripheral blood memory B cells are sorted and expanded for 13 days with interleukin (IL)-2, IL-21 and CD40-ligand expressing cells. The supernatants of large numbers of micro-cultures of these cells can then be screened for neutralizing activity in a high-throughput manner. From the cultures that exhibit anti-HIV neutralizing activity the immunoglobulin genes can then be isolated, re-expressed, and characterized. In 2013 we isolated an antibody, designated 10E8, that is among the most broad and potent thus far described. It binds the gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER) of HIV envelope. It is very potent and neutralizes 98% of tested viruses. An analysis of sera from 78 healthy HIV-1-infected donors demonstrated that 8% contained 10E8-like specificities. In contrast to other neutralizing MPER antibodies, 10E8 did not bind phospholipids, was not autoreactive, and bound cell-surface envelope. The structure of 10E8 in complex with the complete MPER revealed a site of vulnerability comprising a narrow stretch of highly conserved gp41-hydrophobic residues just before the transmembrane region. Analysis of resistant HIV-1 variants confirmed the importance of these residues for neutralization. These data indicate that the highly conserved MPER is a target of potent, non-self-reactive neutralizing antibodies. This suggests that HIV-1 vaccines should aim to induce antibodies to this region of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Through this work we continue to provide a better understanding of the specificities and functions of the HIV-specific humoral immune response that is most likely to provide protection from infection. Over the coming years we anticipate that this work, in the context of work from other groups, will greatly enhance our knowledge of what features of this response should be induced in vaccination strategies.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Zip Code
Wibmer, Constantinos Kurt; Gorman, Jason; Ozorowski, Gabriel et al. (2017) Structure and Recognition of a Novel HIV-1 gp120-gp41 Interface Antibody that Caused MPER Exposure through Viral Escape. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006074
Doria-Rose, Nicole A; Altae-Tran, Han R; Roark, Ryan S et al. (2017) Mapping Polyclonal HIV-1 Antibody Responses via Next-Generation Neutralization Fingerprinting. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006148
Cale, Evan M; Gorman, Jason; Radakovich, Nathan A et al. (2017) Virus-like Particles Identify an HIV V1V2 Apex-Binding Neutralizing Antibody that Lacks a Protruding Loop. Immunity 46:777-791.e10
Julg, Boris; Pegu, Amarendra; Abbink, Peter et al. (2017) Virological Control by the CD4-Binding Site Antibody N6 in Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Monkeys. J Virol 91:
Longo, Nancy S; Sutton, Matthew S; Shiakolas, Andrea R et al. (2016) Multiple Antibody Lineages in One Donor Target the Glycan-V3 Supersite of the HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein and Display a Preference for Quaternary Binding. J Virol 90:10574-10586
Kwon, Young D; Georgiev, Ivelin S; Ofek, Gilad et al. (2016) Optimization of the Solubility of HIV-1-Neutralizing Antibody 10E8 through Somatic Variation and Structure-Based Design. J Virol 90:5899-914
Huang, Jinghe; Kang, Byong H; Ishida, Elise et al. (2016) Identification of a CD4-Binding-Site Antibody to HIV that Evolved Near-Pan Neutralization Breadth. Immunity 45:1108-1121
Soto, Cinque; Ofek, Gilad; Joyce, M Gordon et al. (2016) Developmental Pathway of the MPER-Directed HIV-1-Neutralizing Antibody 10E8. PLoS One 11:e0157409
Sheng, Zizhang; Schramm, Chaim A; Connors, Mark et al. (2016) Effects of Darwinian Selection and Mutability on Rate of Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Evolution during HIV-1 Infection. PLoS Comput Biol 12:e1004940
Stewart-Jones, Guillaume B E; Soto, Cinque; Lemmin, Thomas et al. (2016) Trimeric HIV-1-Env Structures Define Glycan Shields from Clades A, B, and G. Cell 165:813-26

Showing the most recent 10 out of 35 publications