A previous study from this laboratory showed that dopamine (DA) D2 receptors (D2Rs) are involved in the reinforcing effectiveness of different magnitudes of food reinforcement. We attempted to assess the further influence of D2Rs in choice among food-reinforcement frequencies rather than magnitudes. We used the generalized matching law (GML) to assess the role of food reinforcement frequency. The GML specifies that the ratio of responses (or the times allocated to various responses) will match the ratios of reinforcement frequencies obtained from the responses. Congenic D2R knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice were exposed to concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement with scheduled relative-reinforcement rates from 4:1 to 1:4. Acute elimination of D2Rs was assessed using the dopamine antagonist (-)-eticlopride. Response and time allocation ratios were related to obtained reinforcement ratios as predicted by the GML. GML fits accounted for ≥92 % of the variance in allocation ratios and did not differ in D2R KO and WT mice. Similarly, there were no significant effects of (-)-eticlopride dose on GML fits, despite effects on overall response rates. The results demonstrate that neither deletion of D2Rs, nor their acute elimination by pharmacological antagonism, affects choice among response alternatives varying in food-reinforcement frequencies. Because our previous results indicate a role of D2Rs in choice between response alternatives differing in reinforcer magnitude, the current findings suggest that D2Rs play a role in choice only among certain parameters of reinforcement. Further, these findings suggest that different parameters of reinforcement (magnitude, rate) may only be fungible in a complex manner.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
25
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
Zip Code
Soto, Paul L; Hiranita, Takato; Xu, Ming et al. (2016) Dopamine D?-Like Receptors and Behavioral Economics of Food Reinforcement. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:971-8
Soto, Paul L; Grandy, David K; Hursh, Steven R et al. (2015) Erratum to: behavioral economics of food reinforcement and the effects of prefeeding, extinction, and eticlopride in dopamine D? receptor mutant mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232:1669
Soto, Paul L; Hiranita, Takato; Grandy, David K et al. (2014) Choice for response alternatives differing in reinforcement frequency in dopamine D2 receptor mutant and Swiss-Webster mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231:3169-77
Soto, Paul L; Katz, Jonathan L (2013) Interactions of cocaine with dopamine D?-like antagonists in squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226:393-400
Hutchinson, M R; Northcutt, A L; Hiranita, T et al. (2012) Opioid activation of toll-like receptor 4 contributes to drug reinforcement. J Neurosci 32:11187-200
Katz, Jonathan L; Su, Tsung-Ping; Hiranita, Takato et al. (2011) A Role for Sigma Receptors in Stimulant Self Administration and Addiction. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 4:880-914
Soto, Paul L; Grandy, David K; Hursh, Steven R et al. (2011) Behavioral economics of food reinforcement and the effects of prefeeding, extinction, and eticlopride in dopamine D2 receptor mutant mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 215:775-84
Koffarnus, Mikhail N; Katz, Jonathan L (2011) Response requirement and increases in accuracy produced by stimulant drugs in a 5-choice serial reaction-time task in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 213:723-33
Li, Su-Min; Collins, Gregory T; Paul, Noel M et al. (2010) Yawning and locomotor behavior induced by dopamine receptor agonists in mice and rats. Behav Pharmacol 21:171-81
Soto, Paul L; Katz, Jonathan L (2009) Fluoxetine does not alter the ability of dopamine D(1)- and D(2)-like agonists to substitute for cocaine in squirrel monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 92:219-23

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications