This subproject is one of many research subprojects utilizing the resources provided by a Center grant funded by NIH/NCRR. The subproject and investigator (PI) may have received primary funding from another NIH source, and thus could be represented in other CRISP entries. The institution listed is for the Center, which is not necessarily the institution for the investigator. The general objective is to continue to develop new or improved instruments and assessment methods for evaluation clinical effectiveness in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Utilizing 40 Alzheimer's Disease Centers, 650 non-demented elderly individuals (age 75 or older) will be enrolled in the study. Each site may enroll up to 48 participants, 20% of which must be minorities.
The aims of the study include: (1) assess the reliability, efficiency, validity, and sensitivity in detection early AD using new, mostly self-administered instruments that are designed for use in AD prevention trials. These instruments will be evaluated in comparison with clinical outcome and the standard assessments from the participants participating in the four-year study: (2) Evaluate and compare two methods of data acquisition: (a) assessments done at the clinic, and (b) mail in assessments done at home with assistance via telephone: (3) Conduct a pilot evaluation of the feasibility throughout all 40 sites, who have access to computer and the internet, will be randomized into this pilot study: and (4) Compare self-rate to proxy rate versions of some of the instruments. The following hypothesis will be evaluated: (1) the 2 primary data acquisition methods (and the piloted web method) will be adequately reliable; (2) The measures will show adequate validity with respect to measures in the main prevention trial and to measures in other assessment domains; (3) the measures will show good sensitivity to dementia conversion; (4) the assessment conditions will differ with respect to data quality and efficiency; (5) Proxy ratings will overestimate impairment and change relative to participant self-ratings. Participants and informants will attend the screening visit to assess if eligible for the study. If eligible, they will attend the baseline visit, in which they will complete a cognitive battery and have their blood drawn for ApoE and blood/DNA storage. At this point they will be randomized into the clinic group or home group. Participants in the Clinic Group will complete all forms at the clinic. Participants in the Home Group will complete forms via mail and internet. Following this they will complete a 3-month evaluation (either in the clinic or at home). Each year, they will complete an annual cognitive battery, with 6-month telephone follow-up calls to review health status.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
Type
General Clinical Research Centers Program (M01)
Project #
5M01RR000533-38
Application #
7379470
Study Section
National Center for Research Resources Initial Review Group (RIRG)
Project Start
2005-12-01
Project End
2006-11-30
Budget Start
2005-12-01
Budget End
2006-11-30
Support Year
38
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$16,214
Indirect Cost
Name
Boston University
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
604483045
City
Boston
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02118
Berti, Alvise; Warner, Roscoe; Johnson, Kent et al. (2018) Brief Report: Circulating Cytokine Profiles and Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody Specificity in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 70:1114-1121
Christensen, Kurt D; Uhlmann, Wendy R; Roberts, J Scott et al. (2018) A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone. Genet Med 20:132-141
Kattan, Meyer; Bacharier, Leonard B; O'Connor, George T et al. (2018) Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry in Preschool Children: Acceptability and Relationship to Maternal Smoking in Pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 6:1596-1603.e6
Rhee, Rennie L; Davis, John C; Ding, Linna et al. (2018) The Utility of Urinalysis in Determining the Risk of Renal Relapse in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13:251-257
Liebschutz, Jane M; Buchanan-Howland, Kathryn; Chen, Clara A et al. (2018) Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) correlations with prospective violence assessment in a longitudinal cohort. Psychol Assess 30:841-845
Guan, Yue; Roter, Debra L; Wolff, Jennifer L et al. (2018) The impact of genetic counselors' use of facilitative strategies on cognitive and emotional processing of genetic risk disclosure for Alzheimer's disease. Patient Educ Couns 101:817-823
Altman, Matthew C; Whalen, Elizabeth; Togias, Alkis et al. (2018) Allergen-induced activation of natural killer cells represents an early-life immune response in the development of allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 142:1856-1866
Wallace, Zachary S; Miloslavsky, Eli M; Cascino, Matthew et al. (2017) Effect of Disease Activity, Glucocorticoid Exposure, and Rituximab on Body Composition During Induction Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 69:1004-1010
Gern, James E; Calatroni, Agustin; Jaffee, Katy F et al. (2017) Patterns of immune development in urban preschoolers with recurrent wheeze and/or atopy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 140:836-844.e7
Guan, Yue; Roter, Debra L; Erby, Lori H et al. (2017) Disclosing genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease to cognitively impaired patients and visit companions: Findings from the REVEAL Study. Patient Educ Couns 100:927-935

Showing the most recent 10 out of 476 publications