This subproject is one of many research subprojects utilizing theresources provided by a Center grant funded by NIH/NCRR. The subproject andinvestigator (PI) may have received primary funding from another NIH source,and thus could be represented in other CRISP entries. The institution listed isfor the Center, which is not necessarily the institution for the investigator.OBJECTIVE: To conduct clinical studies of steroid hormone responses of Post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol dependent, and normal healthy control subjects to understand the commonalities in their hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and steroid hormone production system.RESEARCH PLAN: Subjects from Groups 1-2 will be admitted to the University Clinical Psychopharmacology Laboratory (UCPL) located at University Hospital for a two day, one overnight procedure. After assuring physiologic and medical stability on the morning of admission, these subjects will undergo two cue exposures during the afternoon of Day 1. Each subject will be exposed to both Control Cues and Salient Cues in two separate cue exposure sessions, scheduled two hours apart, and presented in an order counter-balanced across subjects. For Group 1 subjects, the Salient Cues will be a three minute audio reading of an idiosyncratic script that describes the situation, sights, sounds, and feelings associated with the subject's self-reported experience with a life-threatening traumatic event. The Control Cues for this group will be a similar audio describing a relaxing life-situation. For Group 2 subjects, the Salient Cues will be an alcoholic cue exposure where subjects will be presented with a chilled can of their favorite beer. Over a timed 3 minute procedure, subjects will open the can of beer, pour some in into a cup, sniff and smell the aroma, and finally be allowed to take one mouthful to taste and swallow. The Control Cues for this group will be a similar procedure with a bottle of water. Brief subjective questionnaires and blood samples will be collected repeatedly from both groups of subjects beginning 15 minutes before (i.e., at -15 and -5 min) and for one hour after (at +3, +10, +20, +30, +45, +60 min) each cue exposure procedure (#8 x 5 ml samples = 40 ml total). Subjects from Group 1 and 2 subsequently will remain in the hospital overnight for the progesterone challenge procedure on the next day (Day 2), before discharge from the hospital.The progesterone challenge procedure will begin on Day 2 for subjects from Groups 1 and 2, but will be a single day procedure for Subjects from Group 3 who will be admitted to the UCPL as outpatients for the one day procedure. Beginning at 10:30 a.m., a catheter will be placed and a single sample will be collected from all subjects for PBR analysis. Subjects will receive an oral dose of 300 mg progesterone at 11:00 a.m. and blood samples will be collected repeatedly immediately before, and at 30 min intervals up to 3 hours and then again at 4, 5, and 6 hours after oral dosing. Thus, a total of #12 x 5 ml samples = 60 ml blood total will be drawn.As part of our current research efforts, we have experience using all of these methods to recruit these populations, to conduct behavioral and neuroendocrine studies, and to assay for cortisol, allopregnanolone, and progesterone levels.METHODS: This is just a pilot study supported by a small grant from the McMannis Foundation. It is designed to obtain the preliminary data necessary to demonstrate our ability to conduct these neuroendocrine studies and to look for clinical evidence of a neuroendocrine hypothesis that is well founded by previous research in animals and in humans. Basically, we hypothesize that there will be statistically and clinically meaningful differences in PBR binding and allopregnanolone response between the healthy control subjects and the two diagnostic groups. PBR binding results as well as hormonal peak and AUC response to progesterone will be compared between the three groups by one-way ANOVA. The responses of the diagnostic groups to salient cues will be contrasted by within-subject contrasts with the control cue procedure. There we expect to demonstrate a cortisol response difference between the two types of cue, but that baseline allopregnanolone levels and/or cue response will negatively correlate with the magnitude of the cue response.CLINICAL

Public Health Relevance

Neurosteroids appear to play a fundamental role in adaptive responses to stress and stress-related disorders. These studies should provide the basis for an improved understanding of the commonalities between post-traumatic stress disorder and other psychiatric disturbances including alcohol dependence.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
Type
General Clinical Research Centers Program (M01)
Project #
5M01RR001346-26
Application #
7627525
Study Section
National Center for Research Resources Initial Review Group (RIRG)
Project Start
2007-04-01
Project End
2008-03-31
Budget Start
2007-04-01
Budget End
2008-03-31
Support Year
26
Fiscal Year
2007
Total Cost
$415
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
800772162
City
San Antonio
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
78229
Kawaguchi-Suzuki, Marina; Cusi, Kenneth; Bril, Fernando et al. (2018) A Genetic Score Associates With Pioglitazone Response in Patients With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Front Pharmacol 9:752
Hayden, Kathleen M; Baker, Laura D; Bray, George et al. (2018) Long-term impact of intensive lifestyle intervention on cognitive function assessed with the National Institutes of Health Toolbox: The Look AHEAD study. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 10:41-48
Unick, Jessica L; Gaussoin, Sarah A; Hill, James O et al. (2017) Objectively Assessed Physical Activity and Weight Loss Maintenance among Individuals Enrolled in a Lifestyle Intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring) 25:1903-1909
Kawaguchi-Suzuki, M; Bril, F; Kalavalapalli, S et al. (2017) Concentration-dependent response to pioglitazone in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 46:56-61
Johnson, Karen C; Bray, George A; Cheskin, Lawrence J et al. (2017) The Effect of Intentional Weight Loss on Fracture Risk in Persons With Diabetes: Results From the Look AHEAD Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Miner Res 32:2278-2287
Lorenzo, Carlos; Festa, Andreas; Hanley, Anthony J et al. (2017) Novel Protein Glycan-Derived Markers of Systemic Inflammation and C-Reactive Protein in Relation to Glycemia, Insulin Resistance, and Insulin Secretion. Diabetes Care 40:375-382
Beavers, Kristen M; Leng, Iris; Rapp, Stephen R et al. (2017) Effects of Longitudinal Glucose Exposure on Cognitive and Physical Function: Results from the Action for Health in Diabetes Movement and Memory Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 65:137-145
Chao, Ariana M; Wadden, Thomas A; Gorin, Amy A et al. (2017) Binge Eating and Weight Loss Outcomes in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: 4-Year Results from the Look AHEAD Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 25:1830-1837
Lorenzo, C; Hanley, A J; Rewers, M J et al. (2016) Discriminatory value of alanine aminotransferase for diabetes prediction: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabet Med 33:348-55
Fowler, Sharon P G (2016) Low-calorie sweetener use and energy balance: Results from experimental studies in animals, and large-scale prospective studies in humans. Physiol Behav 164:517-523

Showing the most recent 10 out of 600 publications