Three-dimensional (3D) form is a fundamental perceptual category that transcends individual sensory systems. A vivid percept of 3D form can be obtained from touch, from vision, or from both. The neural representations that underlie 3D for perception may be supramodal (independent or the individual sensory systems), multimodal (based on strong links between representations in the individual systems, or a mixture of the two. There are two compelling reasons to undertake the study of 3D form perception. The first is that 3D form perception is a paradigm of sensory integration in the brain. The second is that 3D form perception is a fundamental cognitive function whose neural mechanisms are almost completely unknown. Four individual projects are proposed, two involving somatosensory neurophysiology and two involving visual neurophysiology. Tactual perception of 3D form simultaneously on the conformation on the hand and on the integration of information from the multiple points of contact with the fingertips. Project 1 (Johnson) deals with how neurons respond to 3D stimuli (edges, corners, curvature) at multiple points of contact. Project 3 (Hsiao) concentrates on how responses depend on the conformation of the hand. Visual perception of 3D form is derived from 2D images; this process depends on the integration of visual information with implicit knowledge about optics and the 3D world. Project 2 (Conner) addresses how neurons in visual cortex represent the basic elements of 3D share (3D edges, corners, surface curvature, and simple volumes like blocks and cylinders). Project 4 (von der Hyedt) concentrations on the integration of binocular and monocular and cue conflict. The core project concerns shared services, administration, and project coordination.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Type
Research Program Projects (P01)
Project #
5P01NS038034-03
Application #
6394026
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZNS1-SRB-W (01))
Program Officer
Edwards, Emmeline
Project Start
1999-09-10
Project End
2004-06-30
Budget Start
2001-07-01
Budget End
2002-06-30
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$1,021,025
Indirect Cost
Name
Johns Hopkins University
Department
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
045911138
City
Baltimore
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
21218
Pei, Yu-Cheng; Hsiao, Steven S; Craig, James C et al. (2011) Neural mechanisms of tactile motion integration in somatosensory cortex. Neuron 69:536-47
Yoshioka, Takashi; Zhou, Julia (2009) Factors Involved in Tactile Texture Perception through Probes. Adv Robot 23:747-766
Pei, Y C; Hsiao, S S; Bensmaia, S J (2008) The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:8130-5
Muniak, Michael A; Ray, Supratim; Hsiao, Steven S et al. (2007) The neural coding of stimulus intensity: linking the population response of mechanoreceptive afferents with psychophysical behavior. J Neurosci 27:11687-99
Killebrew, Justin H; Bensmaia, Sliman J; Dammann, John F et al. (2007) A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli. J Neurosci Methods 161:62-74
Sripati, Arun P; Bensmaia, Sliman J; Johnson, Kenneth O (2006) A continuum mechanical model of mechanoreceptive afferent responses to indented spatial patterns. J Neurophysiol 95:3852-64
Sripati, Arun P; Johnson, Kenneth O (2006) Dynamic gain changes during attentional modulation. Neural Comput 18:1847-67
Bensmaia, S J; Craig, J C; Johnson, K O (2006) Temporal factors in tactile spatial acuity: evidence for RA interference in fine spatial processing. J Neurophysiol 95:1783-91
Bensmaia, S J; Killebrew, J H; Craig, J C (2006) Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception. J Neurophysiol 96:1625-37
Berryman, L J; Yau, J M; Hsiao, S S (2006) Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. J Neurophysiol 96:27-39

Showing the most recent 10 out of 26 publications