MD Anderson uses several external and internal review mechanisms for planning and evaluation to develop and improve the cancer center. External Reviews: For the past 27 years, MD Anderson has used funding from the CCSG to support an External Advisory Board (EAB), consisting of a group of 30 distinguished scientific advisors that meets annually at MD Anderson to provide advice to Dr. DePinho, CCSG senior leadership, CCSG program leaders, and CCSG shared resource directors. The objectives of the EAB are to review research programs and shared resources, and evaluate their productivity, excellence, and alignment with institutional goals;to identify gaps in scientific expertise or capabilities and to suggest options for closing these gaps;to consider new programs or restructuring of existing programs;to assist in recruiting outstanding faculty to the institution;to evaluate the extent of collaboration between basic scientists, translational/clinical scientists, and population-based investigators, recommending actions to enhance interactivity among these three groups: External reviews of shared resources consist of visits by an ad hoc EAB of 3 outside experts specific to each core and have been conducted for 7 of the 16 shared resources presented in this application. Plans are to extend these reviews to additional shared resources. Internal Reviews: Mechanisms for internal review of research programs, shared resources, and research planning include formal Research Council presentations of programs and shared resources, the Institutional Clinical Executive Committee (ICEC) and the Institutional Research Executive Committee (IREC), which advise Dr. DePinho on strategic issues related to clinical and research activities, and the CCSG Executive Committee which oversees CCSG program and shared resource development in the context of the broader institutional research strategy. Surveys, focus groups, and user committees have also reviewed each shared resource during the current grant period. Strategic Planning: A comprehensive planning exercise across a broad, multidisciplinary perspective, the Moon Shot developed proposals for 11 cancers that integrate all aspects of the cancer continuum - prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship to impact survival over the next several years. Five of these areas will be selected for intensive organization and support. All CCSG programs are intimately involved with the development of these plans, which will chart the course for future programmatic research.

Public Health Relevance

The EAB adds value as a quality-assurance mechanism and sounding board for research initiatives by bringing together a diverse and distinguished group of cancer research leaders whose recommendations often reflect current best practices in leading biomedical research centers and who provide objectivity only available through outside counsel.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30CA016672-39
Application #
8759808
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-07-01
Budget End
2015-06-30
Support Year
39
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$86,855
Indirect Cost
$32,593
Name
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
800772139
City
Houston
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
77030
DiNardo, Courtney D; Rausch, Caitlin R; Benton, Christopher et al. (2018) Clinical experience with the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax in combination therapy for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia and related myeloid malignancies. Am J Hematol 93:401-407
Zhao, Wei; Li, Jun; Akbani, Rehan et al. (2018) Credentialing Individual Samples for Proteogenomic Analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 17:1515-1530
Yu, Yao; Hu, Hao; Chen, Jiun-Sheng et al. (2018) Integrated case-control and somatic-germline interaction analyses of melanoma susceptibility genes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1864:2247-2254
Melancon, Marites P; Appleton Figueira, Tomas; Fuentes, David T et al. (2018) Development of an Electroporation and Nanoparticle-based Therapeutic Platform for Bone Metastases. Radiology 286:149-157
Zhao, Hui; Zhang, Ning; Ho, Vivian et al. (2018) Adherence to treatment guidelines and survival for older patients with stage II or III colon cancer in Texas from 2001 through 2011. Cancer 124:679-687
Pan, Hubert Y; Jiang, Jing; Hoffman, Karen E et al. (2018) Comparative Toxicities and Cost of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Proton Radiation, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Among Younger Men With Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:1823-1830
Grossberg, Aaron J; Mohamed, Abdallah S R; Elhalawani, Hesham et al. (2018) Imaging and clinical data archive for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy. Sci Data 5:180173
Lu, Zhimin; Hunter, Tony (2018) Metabolic Kinases Moonlighting as Protein Kinases. Trends Biochem Sci 43:301-310
Beadnell, Thomas C; Nassar, Kelsey W; Rose, Madison M et al. (2018) Src-mediated regulation of the PI3K pathway in advanced papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancer. Oncogenesis 7:23
Chen, Xiuhui; Mangala, Lingegowda S; Rodriguez-Aguayo, Cristian et al. (2018) RNA interference-based therapy and its delivery systems. Cancer Metastasis Rev 37:107-124

Showing the most recent 10 out of 12418 publications