9.2 PROTOCOL REVIEW AND MONITORING SYSTEM Purpose The Scientific Review Committee (SRC) ensures that all cancer clinical trials conducted under the auspices of Vanderbilt-lngram Cancer Center (VICC) meet the committee's pre-defined standards of scientific design. The Committee is also responsible for assigning a priority score for each protocol that indicates the amount of Cancer Center support a particular protocol should receive. Protocols requiring full committee review are evaluated for appropriate scientific rationale, clearly defined specific aims, achievable study endpoints, a plausible biostatistical plan, feasibility issues, and a justifiable ability to accrue patients. These criteria exist to ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with scientific principles that will allow the scientific aims of the study to be met. This clearly sets the SRC's role apart from the IRB, which primarily concerned with patient safety, while the SRC is focused on sound science designed one day to be translated into better practice. While the SRC and IRB have separate and distinct functions, they complement each other by ensuring the overall integrity of the study from both scientific and patient protection viewpoints. The SRC also assists in determining the level of VICC support for a particular protocol;the IRB has no role in this determination.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
2P30CA068485-14
Application #
8180835
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
2010-09-10
Project End
2015-08-31
Budget Start
2010-09-10
Budget End
2011-08-31
Support Year
14
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$92,279
Indirect Cost
Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
004413456
City
Nashville
State
TN
Country
United States
Zip Code
37212
Iams, Wade T; Yu, Hui; Shyr, Yu et al. (2018) First-line Chemotherapy Responsiveness and Patterns of Metastatic Spread Identify Clinical Syndromes Present Within Advanced KRAS Mutant Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer With Different Prognostic Significance. Clin Lung Cancer 19:531-543
Diggins, Kirsten E; Gandelman, Jocelyn S; Roe, Caroline E et al. (2018) Generating Quantitative Cell Identity Labels with Marker Enrichment Modeling (MEM). Curr Protoc Cytom 83:10.21.1-10.21.28
Warner, Jeremy L; Prasad, Ishaan; Bennett, Makiah et al. (2018) SMART Cancer Navigator: A Framework for Implementing ASCO Workshop Recommendations to Enable Precision Cancer Medicine. JCO Precis Oncol 2018:
Brown, Judy J; Short, Sarah P; Stencel-Baerenwald, Jennifer et al. (2018) Reovirus-Induced Apoptosis in the Intestine Limits Establishment of Enteric Infection. J Virol 92:
Engevik, Amy C; Kaji, Izumi; Engevik, Melinda A et al. (2018) Loss of MYO5B Leads to Reductions in Na+ Absorption With Maintenance of CFTR-Dependent Cl- Secretion in Enterocytes. Gastroenterology 155:1883-1897.e10
Earl, David C; Ferrell Jr, P Brent; Leelatian, Nalin et al. (2018) Discovery of human cell selective effector molecules using single cell multiplexed activity metabolomics. Nat Commun 9:39
Hormuth 2nd, David A; Eldridge, Stephanie L; Weis, Jared A et al. (2018) Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model to Predict Glioma Growth: Methodological Details. Methods Mol Biol 1711:225-241
Lockhart, Jacob N; Spoonmore, Thomas J; McCurdy, Michael W et al. (2018) Poly(glycidol) Coating on Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene for Reduced Biofilm Growth. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:4050-4056
Rogers, Meredith C; Lamens, Kristina D; Shafagati, Nazly et al. (2018) CD4+ Regulatory T Cells Exert Differential Functions during Early and Late Stages of the Immune Response to Respiratory Viruses. J Immunol 201:1253-1266
Takata, Yumie; Xiang, Yong-Bing; Burk, Raymond F et al. (2018) Plasma selenoprotein P concentration and lung cancer risk: results from a case-control study nested within the Shanghai Men's Health Study. Carcinogenesis 39:1352-1358

Showing the most recent 10 out of 2462 publications