9.2 PROTOCOL REVIEW AND MONITORING SYSTEM Purpose The Scientific Review Committee (SRC) ensures that all cancer clinical trials conducted under the auspices of Vanderbilt-lngram Cancer Center (VICC) meet the committee's pre-defined standards of scientific design. The Committee is also responsible for assigning a priority score for each protocol that indicates the amount of Cancer Center support a particular protocol should receive. Protocols requiring full committee review are evaluated for appropriate scientific rationale, clearly defined specific aims, achievable study endpoints, a plausible biostatistical plan, feasibility issues, and a justifiable ability to accrue patients. These criteria exist to ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with scientific principles that will allow the scientific aims of the study to be met. This clearly sets the SRC's role apart from the IRB, which primarily concerned with patient safety, while the SRC is focused on sound science designed one day to be translated into better practice. While the SRC and IRB have separate and distinct functions, they complement each other by ensuring the overall integrity of the study from both scientific and patient protection viewpoints. The SRC also assists in determining the level of VICC support for a particular protocol;the IRB has no role in this determination.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30CA068485-18
Application #
8733549
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2014-09-01
Budget End
2015-08-31
Support Year
18
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$162,868
Indirect Cost
$89,303
Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
004413456
City
Nashville
State
TN
Country
United States
Zip Code
37212
Bloodworth, Melissa H; Rusznak, Mark; Pfister, Connor C et al. (2018) Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor signaling attenuates respiratory syncytial virus-induced type 2 responses and immunopathology. J Allergy Clin Immunol 142:683-687.e12
Saito-Diaz, Kenyi; Benchabane, Hassina; Tiwari, Ajit et al. (2018) APC Inhibits Ligand-Independent Wnt Signaling by the Clathrin Endocytic Pathway. Dev Cell 44:566-581.e8
Cardin, Dana B; Thota, Ramya; Goff, Laura W et al. (2018) A Phase II Study of Ganetespib as Second-line or Third-line Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 41:772-776
Hormuth 2nd, David A; Weis, Jared A; Barnes, Stephanie L et al. (2018) Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100:1270-1279
Rojas, Juan D; Lin, Fanglue; Chiang, Yun-Chen et al. (2018) Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of VEGFR-2 in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Tracks Disease Response to Antiangiogenic and Notch-Inhibition Therapy. Theranostics 8:141-155
Dutter, Brendan F; Ender, Anna; Sulikowski, Gary A et al. (2018) Rhodol-based thallium sensors for cellular imaging of potassium channel activity. Org Biomol Chem 16:5575-5579
Vierra, Nicholas C; Dickerson, Matthew T; Jordan, Kelli L et al. (2018) TALK-1 reduces delta-cell endoplasmic reticulum and cytoplasmic calcium levels limiting somatostatin secretion. Mol Metab 9:84-97
Schlegel, Cameron; Weis, Victoria G; Knowles, Byron C et al. (2018) Apical Membrane Alterations in Non-intestinal Organs in Microvillus Inclusion Disease. Dig Dis Sci 63:356-365
Lewis Jr, James S; Shelton, Jeremy; Kuhs, Krystle Lang et al. (2018) p16 Immunohistochemistry in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using the E6H4 Antibody Clone: A Technical Method Study for Optimal Dilution. Head Neck Pathol 12:440-447
Werfel, Thomas A; Wang, Shan; Jackson, Meredith A et al. (2018) Selective mTORC2 Inhibitor Therapeutically Blocks Breast Cancer Cell Growth and Survival. Cancer Res 78:1845-1858

Showing the most recent 10 out of 2462 publications