The Scientific Review Committees (SRC) provide thorough scientific reviews of all protocols to be activated at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Support of the SRC process is the primary focus of the staff within the Protocol Review and Monitoring (OPRM). Specific goals of the PRMS are: Appropriate and thorough scientific and statistical review of Moffitt protocols Efficient processing and accurate tracking of Moffitt clinical research protocols, and Monitoring of scientific progress for ongoing clinical research trials. OPRM support staff process the documents necessary for the review committees and facilitate timely communication of SRC actions between the committee and investigators. All correspondence is saved electronically and noted within the research database (Oncore). Support staff members also assist investigators in the development of protocol-specific data and safety monitoring plans. The OPRM office maintains an accurate protocol-tracking database for use by the regulatory staff, principal investigators, study teams, and committee members to monitor protocol progress through the review processes, including SRC and IRB review, budgeting, and contracting as appropriate, and an operational review process to allow ancillary departments to review and sign off on protocol feasibility. Other OPRM staff members assist Moffitt investigators with efficient, accurate review and processing of research protocols and submission to the IRB for human subject approval and work with monitors in the data and safety monitoring process. Moffitt has committees that perform scientific review, each meeting monthly. Two committees review clinical research proposals, while the third committee reviews tissue and data studies. Meeting dates are staggered to allow for SRC meetings approximately every 10 days. The three SRCs provide the initial scientific peer review of the protocol and monitor these protocols throughout the term of the study for scientific progress (e.g., meeting accrual goals) and for changes that might impact the objectives of the study. The PRMS requests CCSG Support of $247,671, which is 28% of its operational budget.

Public Health Relevance

The Protocol Review and Monitoring System (PRMS) monitors all clinical and translational trials to provide Moffitt investigators with efficient, accurate review and processing of research protocols and submission to the IRB for human subject approval and work with monitors in the data and safety monitoring process. The PRMS is essential in providing infrastructure and support for conducting clinical research.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30CA076292-17
Application #
8815022
Study Section
Subcommittee G - Education (NCI)
Project Start
Project End
2016-01-31
Budget Start
2015-02-01
Budget End
2016-01-31
Support Year
17
Fiscal Year
2015
Total Cost
$143,043
Indirect Cost
$58,151
Name
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Department
Type
DUNS #
139301956
City
Tampa
State
FL
Country
United States
Zip Code
33612
Palmer, Amanda M; Brandon, Thomas H (2018) How do electronic cigarettes affect cravings to smoke or vape? Parsing the influences of nicotine and expectancies using the balanced-placebo design. J Consult Clin Psychol 86:486-491
Hellmann, Matthew D; Callahan, Margaret K; Awad, Mark M et al. (2018) Tumor Mutational Burden and Efficacy of Nivolumab Monotherapy and in Combination with Ipilimumab in Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Cell 33:853-861.e4
Trabert, Britton; Poole, Elizabeth M; White, Emily et al. (2018) Analgesic Use and Ovarian Cancer Risk: An Analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst :
Liu, Ying; Kim, Jongphil; Balagurunathan, Yoganand et al. (2018) Prediction of pathological nodal involvement by CT-based Radiomic features of the primary tumor in patients with clinically node-negative peripheral lung adenocarcinomas. Med Phys 45:2518-2526
Dougoud-Chauvin, Vérène; Lee, Jae Jin; Santos, Edgardo et al. (2018) Using Big Data in oncology to prospectively impact clinical patient care: A proof of concept study. J Geriatr Oncol 9:665-672
Wu, Xiaowei; Ji, Haitao (2018) Rhodium(iii)-catalyzed C-H allylation of indoles with allyl alcohols via ?-hydroxide elimination. Org Biomol Chem 16:5691-5698
Perales-Puchalt, Alfredo; Perez-Sanz, Jairo; Payne, Kyle K et al. (2018) Frontline Science: Microbiota reconstitution restores intestinal integrity after cisplatin therapy. J Leukoc Biol 103:799-805
Davis, Stacy N; Govindaraju, Swapamthi; Jackson, Brittany et al. (2018) Recruitment Techniques and Strategies in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Study of Men and Women of African Ancestry. Nurs Res 67:212-221
Martínez, Úrsula; Brandon, Thomas H; Sutton, Steven K et al. (2018) Associations between the smoking-relatedness of a cancer type, cessation attitudes and beliefs, and future abstinence among recent quitters. Psychooncology 27:2104-2110
Kasting, Monica L; Giuliano, Anna R; Reich, Richard R et al. (2018) Hepatitis C Virus Screening Trends: Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey Population, 2013-2015. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:503-513

Showing the most recent 10 out of 1254 publications