The first of our four cores is devoted to the overall grant administration. The Administrative Core covers the overall structural organization of the COBRE III. In this section we will present the principles on which the administrative structure was designed, as well as the specific ways in which those principles will be implemented. The COBRE PI/PD has overall responsibility for the grant and is assisted by an Internal Steering Committee and an External Advisory Committee (EAC). The Internal Steering Committee assists with day-today administration of the grant and the EAC provides guidance on larger issues. It also provides expert assistance in scientific review of pilot projects and critiques grant ideas as well as fully developed grant proposals prior to submission. A Program Coordinator, whose main role is to oversee the research instrumentation cores, provides additional management of the COBRE grant. The Administrative Core also oversees faculty meetings (monthly and annually) as well as an annual faculty retreat. The core also addresses issues of faculty mentoring and program evaluation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30GM103333-02
Application #
8518410
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRR1-RI-B)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2013-05-01
Budget End
2014-04-30
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2013
Total Cost
$165,880
Indirect Cost
$71,626
Name
University of Delaware
Department
Type
DUNS #
059007500
City
Newark
State
DE
Country
United States
Zip Code
19716
Zellers, Jennifer A; Cortes, Daniel H; Pohlig, Ryan T et al. (2018) Tendon morphology and mechanical properties assessed by ultrasound show change early in recovery and potential prognostic ability for 6-month outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc :
Khandha, Ashutosh; Manal, Kurt; Capin, Jacob et al. (2018) High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. J Orthop Res :
Capin, Jacob J; Khandha, Ashutosh; Zarzycki, Ryan et al. (2018) Gait Mechanics After ACL Reconstruction Differ According to Medial Meniscal Treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1209-1216
Grindle, Daniel M; Baker, Lauren; Furr, Mike et al. (2018) The Effects of Walking Workstations on Biomechanical Performance. J Appl Biomech 34:349-353
Youn, Ik-Hyun; Youn, Jong-Hoon; Zeni, Joseph A et al. (2018) Biomechanical Gait Variable Estimation Using Wearable Sensors after Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. Sensors (Basel) 18:
Wellsandt, Elizabeth; Failla, Matthew J; Axe, Michael J et al. (2018) Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury? Am J Sports Med 46:2103-2112
Na, Annalisa; Piva, Sara R; Buchanan, Thomas S (2018) Influences of knee osteoarthritis and walking difficulty on knee kinematics and kinetics. Gait Posture 61:439-444
Capin, Jacob J; Khandha, Ashutosh; Zarzycki, Ryan et al. (2018) Gait mechanics and tibiofemoral loading in men of the ACL-SPORTS randomized control trial. J Orthop Res 36:2364-2372
Zhang, Bingbing; Hou, Rutao; Zou, Zhen et al. (2018) Mechanically induced autophagy is associated with ATP metabolism and cellular viability in osteocytes in vitro. Redox Biol 14:492-498
Kempski, Kelley; Awad, Louis N; Buchanan, Thomas S et al. (2018) Dynamic structure of lower limb joint angles during walking post-stroke. J Biomech 68:1-5

Showing the most recent 10 out of 71 publications