This Methods Core supports research within the Center for Research on Quality in Managed Care. The proposed Center evaluates quality of care, and developes and evaluates approaches to improve quality of care for various stakeholder groups (consumers, practices, communities) across several major psychiatric disorders (depression, schizophrenia, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder), developmental age groups, and cultural groups. Rigorous research methods that span qualitative, quantitative, and integrative strategies are necessary to support this research. The Center has a strong history of quantitative, design, and policy expertise that is supplement in the new Center through an emphasis on qualitative, contextual data.
The Specific Aims of the Methods Core are: 1) to provide methodological support to the Center's ongoing studies and pilot projects; 2) to advance methods in mental health services research, especially the evaluation and quality improvement of community-based care for culturally diverse populations with major psychiatric disorders, through integration of qualitative and quantitative methods and development of new research design and methods; and 3) to support policy analyses and application of economic methods consistent with the Center's themes. To achieve these aims, the Core structure features three complmentary units: the Qualitative Methods Unit that will focus on local context and multiple stakeholder perspectives; the Biostatistical Methods and Design Unit that will provide the infrastructure, technical expertise, and resources to address methdological challenges in community-based research; and a Policy and Economic Methods Unit that will advance policy research methods and analyze substantive policy issues concerning how local financing and market forces affect access to and costs and quality of mental health care. Within this core, a Working Group on Interdisciplinary Methods for Minority and Cultural Issues is formed to inform the Center on diverse disciplinary and conceptual approaches to incorporating cultural perspectives in interventions research. The Units are supplemented by consulting with the RAND statistical Consulting group, the Qualitative Methods Core of the UCLA-NPI Center for Culture, the Latino Research Program Project, and the new Drew/UCLA Project Export Center for Health Disparities Research.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Center Core Grants (P30)
Project #
5P30MH068639-03
Application #
7553511
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMH1)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
2005-08-01
Budget End
2006-07-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
$157,916
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California Los Angeles
Department
Type
DUNS #
092530369
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90095
Choi, Kristen R; Sherbourne, Cathy; Tang, Lingqi et al. (2018) A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Depression Collaborative Care: Subanalysis of Comorbid Anxiety. West J Nurs Res :193945918800333
Ong, Michael K; Jones, Loretta; Aoki, Wayne et al. (2017) A Community-Partnered, Participatory, Cluster-Randomized Study of Depression Care Quality Improvement: Three-Year Outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 68:1262-1270
Sherbourne, Cathy D; Aoki, Wayne; Belin, Thomas R et al. (2017) Comparative Effectiveness of Two Models of Depression Services Quality Improvement in Health and Community Sectors. Psychiatr Serv 68:1315-1320
Landry, Craig M; Jackson, Aurora P; Tang, Lingqi et al. (2017) The Effects of Collaborative Care Training on Case Managers' Perceived Depression-Related Services Delivery. Psychiatr Serv 68:123-130
Ngo, Victoria K; Sherbourne, Cathy; Chung, Bowen et al. (2016) Community Engagement Compared With Technical Assistance to Disseminate Depression Care Among Low-Income, Minority Women: A Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study. Am J Public Health 106:1833-41
Bromley, Elizabeth; Kennedy, David; Miranda, Jeanne et al. (2016) The Fracture of Relational Space in Depression: Predicaments in Primary Care Help Seeking. Curr Anthropol 57:610-631
Lam, Christine A; Sherbourne, Cathy; Tang, Lingqi et al. (2016) The Impact of Community Engagement on Health, Social, and Utilization Outcomes in Depressed, Impoverished Populations: Secondary Findings from a Randomized Trial. J Am Board Fam Med 29:325-38
Chang, Evelyn T; Wells, Kenneth B; Gilmore, James et al. (2015) Comorbid depression and substance abuse among safety-net clients in Los Angeles: a community participatory study. Psychiatr Serv 66:285-94
Chung, Bowen; Ong, Michael; Ettner, Susan L et al. (2014) 12-month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: a partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial. Ann Intern Med 161:S23-34
Wells, Kenneth B; Miranda, Jeanne (2013) Differential mortality for persons with psychological distress and low socioeconomic status: what does it mean and what can be done? JAMA Intern Med 173:27-8

Showing the most recent 10 out of 102 publications