The widespread adoption of screening mammography has led to an increase in the diagnoses ofductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. While it is estimated that 62,000 women will be diagnosed withDCIS in 2006, only a small fraction of these women (~10-20%) will subsequently develop invasive breastcancer or die of the disease. However, most women with DCIS are treated similarly, i.e. the DCIS issurgically excised during lumpectomy and additional radiation or tamoxifen is often offered. This means thatmany women are receiving unnecessary adjuvant radiation, adjuvant hormonal therapy, or mastectomy toprevent invasive cancers that will not occur. Additionally, a minority of women is not receiving adequateintervention because they subsequently develop a tumor after local excision alone. Identifying molecularmarkers that can accurately predict subsequent DCIS and/or invasive cancer events could aid in stratifyingan individual's risk for subsequent disease and response to therapy. Thus, to avoid over- and undertreatment of these women, there is a critical need for studies with complete pathology review, molecularmarker measurements and long term follow-up to determine prognostic factors can be accurately andreproduciblv measured and are consistently associated with subsequent tumor events among women withDCIS. Exciting preliminary data have demonstrated that expression of specific markers is associated withincreased probability of subsequent tumor events following lumpectomy alone. Using a large, establishedand well-characterized population-based cohort of women with DCIS treated by lumpectomy alone with 8.1years of follow-up, we will examine the role of these and additional markers in signaling subsequent diseaseevents. To accomplish this, we will: 1) Validate assays and correlation of biomarkers with outcomeretrospectively (a) using a large number of specimens (b) in different labs and (c) determine if it isstatistically robust. (2) Refine clinical biomarker assay reagents using multiplex methodology. (3)Validate correlation of biomarker with outcome in a prospective human study. (4) Develop a riskassessment model to assist women and physicians with clinical decision-making about treatment forDCIS. (5) Evaluate vHMEC biomarkers as potential diagnostic targets. The risk assessment tool willestimate the risk of subsequent DCIS and invasive events for an individual woman as a function of herclinical (e.g., age at diagnosis) and histopathology (e.g., nuclear grade, margin width) information, andmolecular markers (e.g., Ki67, p16, COX-2). This decision-making tool could be applied to women entering arandomized controlled trial to determine if our risk assessment tool consistently predicts subsequent diseaseand type of disease. The evaluation of biomarkers as potential diagnostic targets may provide the basis inthe future for developing a targeted imaging and preventive agents for clinical use.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
2P50CA058207-14
Application #
7384729
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-RPRB-M (O1))
Project Start
2007-12-01
Project End
2012-11-30
Budget Start
2007-12-01
Budget End
2008-11-30
Support Year
14
Fiscal Year
2008
Total Cost
$189,868
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California San Francisco
Department
Type
DUNS #
094878337
City
San Francisco
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94143
Rice, Megan S; Tamimi, Rulla M; Bertrand, Kimberly A et al. (2018) Does mammographic density mediate risk factor associations with breast cancer? An analysis by tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170:129-141
Zhou, Yu; Zou, Hao; Yau, Christina et al. (2018) Discovery of internalizing antibodies to basal breast cancer cells. Protein Eng Des Sel 31:17-28
Campbell, Jeffrey I; Yau, Christina; Krass, Polina et al. (2017) Comparison of residual cancer burden, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and pathologic complete response in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657). Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:181-191
Campbell, Michael J; Baehner, Frederick; O'Meara, Tess et al. (2017) Characterizing the immune microenvironment in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161:17-28
Bolan, Patrick J; Kim, Eunhee; Herman, Benjamin A et al. (2017) MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: Results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:290-302
Olow, Aleksandra; Chen, Zhongzhong; Niedner, R Hannes et al. (2016) An Atlas of the Human Kinome Reveals the Mutational Landscape Underlying Dysregulated Phosphorylation Cascades in Cancer. Cancer Res 76:1733-45
Takai, Ken; Le, Annie; Weaver, Valerie M et al. (2016) Targeting the cancer-associated fibroblasts as a treatment in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 7:82889-82901
Hu, Zhi; Mao, Jian-Hua; Curtis, Christina et al. (2016) Genome co-amplification upregulates a mitotic gene network activity that predicts outcome and response to mitotic protein inhibitors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 18:70
Malkov, Serghei; Shepherd, John A; Scott, Christopher G et al. (2016) Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status. Breast Cancer Res 18:122
Gu, Shenda; Hu, Zhi; Ngamcherdtrakul, Worapol et al. (2016) Therapeutic siRNA for drug-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer. Oncotarget 7:14727-41

Showing the most recent 10 out of 339 publications