Our objective is to further characterize the natural history of clinically localized prostate cancer managed conservatively. From standard prognostic factors, we will construct prognostic nomograms to compute for individual patients the probabilities of clinical progression (symptomatic local or distant) and of cancer-related death at a given time after diagnosis. Information from these """"""""conservative management"""""""" nomograms and our prior aggressive therapy nomograms will be used to construct more robust decision analysis models for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Through a prospective clinical trial, we will test the hypothesis that men who choose treatment recommended by this model will be less likely to regret their decision. We will also use novel gene expression methods to identify and validate prognostically useful molecular markers that have the potential to increase the predictive accuracy of our nomograms.
Our Specific Aims are: 1) To further define the natural history of clinically localized prostate cancer by identifying in an epidemiologic, population-based study in the United Kingdom a consecutive cohort of 2000 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the PSA era but managed conservatively. In collaboration with the Imperial Cancer Research Fund, we will identify from regional tumor registries 2000 men diagnosed between 1990 and 1996 who had no treatment for at least 6 months after diagnosis and are eligible for a minimum follow-up of 5 years (maximum 10-16 years by completion of the SPORE in 2006). We will identify a second cohort of 2000 men treated with hormonal therapy alone within 6 months of diagnosis. Diagnostic biopsy specimens (mostly TURP) and clinical information will be retrieved and uniformly graded and staged with centralized review and the data computerized for further analyses. 2) To derive a nomogram that predicts the probability of progression (to symptomatic local or distant metastases), based on clinical prognostic factors (clinical stage, Gleason grade, and PSA level) for those cohorts of men managed conservatively (untreated or with hormonal therapy alone). 3) To construct a decision-analysis model which incorporates information from the conservative management nomograms and the aggressive-therapy nomograms previously developed and determine in a prospective clinical trial whether patients who chose treatment identified by the model as most beneficial (in quality adjusted life years) are less likely to regret their choice. 4) To identify and validate expressed genes in prostate cancer that correlate with outcome and evaluate their ability to complement nomogram prediction of progression for clinically localized disease.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
1P50CA092629-01
Application #
6547825
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1)
Project Start
2001-09-14
Project End
2006-08-31
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
Department
Type
DUNS #
064931884
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10065
Aras, Omer; Pearce, Gillian; Watkins, Adam J et al. (2018) An in-vivo pilot study into the effects of FDG-mNP in cancer in mice. PLoS One 13:e0202482
Sjoberg, Daniel D; Vickers, Andrew J; Assel, Melissa et al. (2018) Twenty-year Risk of Prostate Cancer Death by Midlife Prostate-specific Antigen and a Panel of Four Kallikrein Markers in a Large Population-based Cohort of Healthy Men. Eur Urol 73:941-948
Vickers, Andrew J; Young-Afat, Danny A; Ehdaie, Behfar et al. (2018) Just-in-time consent: The ethical case for an alternative to traditional informed consent in randomized trials comparing an experimental intervention with usual care. Clin Trials 15:3-8
Assel, Melissa; Dahlin, Anders; Ulmert, David et al. (2018) Association Between Lead Time and Prostate Cancer Grade: Evidence of Grade Progression from Long-term Follow-up of Large Population-based Cohorts Not Subject to Prostate-specific Antigen Screening. Eur Urol 73:961-967
Han, SoHyun; Stoyanova, Radka; Lee, Hansol et al. (2018) Automation of pattern recognition analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data to characterize intratumoral vascular heterogeneity. Magn Reson Med 79:1736-1744
Vickers, Andrew J; Steineck, Gunnar (2018) Prognosis, Effect Modification, and Mediation. Eur Urol 74:243-245
Kinsella, Netty; Helleman, Jozien; Bruinsma, Sophie et al. (2018) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of contemporary worldwide practices. Transl Androl Urol 7:83-97
Hieronymus, Haley; Murali, Rajmohan; Tin, Amy et al. (2018) Tumor copy number alteration burden is a pan-cancer prognostic factor associated with recurrence and death. Elife 7:
Scher, Howard I; Graf, Ryon P; Schreiber, Nicole A et al. (2018) Assessment of the Validity of Nuclear-Localized Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictive Biomarker for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 4:1179-1186
Bielski, Craig M; Zehir, Ahmet; Penson, Alexander V et al. (2018) Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat Genet 50:1189-1195

Showing the most recent 10 out of 505 publications