The Biospecimen Repository Core is designed to provide support to the basic translational research efforts of theSPORE. The Core will play a central role in collecting, annotating, storing, distributing, and tracking prostatecancer tissue and blood biospecimens from patients enrolled in research protocols. The Core will also addressthe need for interoperability with national efforts such as the National Biospecimen Network (NBN) and CancerBiomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG). Detailed biospecimen annotation, including documentation of preanalyticprocessing variables, pathology findings, and patient clinical history information will be recorded in robustrelational databases. We will conduct rigorous data quality assurance and quality control measures, andstandardized longitudinal follow-up of all consented patients with materials in the prostate biospecimenrepository. The Core will provide SPORE investigators with expert histopathological evaluation of tumor samplesboth from patients enrolled on research protocols and from xenograft models, The Core will also provideassistance in performing and interpreting immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization assays, in selectingtissue for microdissection and construction of arrays, and in collaborating with project leaders and theBiostatistics Core.The four key focus areas for the prostate SPORE Biospecimen Repository are high quality banked tissue(frozen and paraffin-embedded) and blood (serum and plasma), accurate and updated procedural, pathologic,and clinical annotation, efficient and effective distribution of biospecimens for use in research protocols, and arobust tracking system capable of monitoring biospecimens from the time of collection through utilization.Integrating these four components is a major goal of the Biospecimen Repository Core,Through the work of this SPORE, supported by the Biospecimen Repository Core, we hope to increase ourunderstanding of the clinical, biologic, and genetic basis of prostate cancer in an effort to improve patientoutcome, to facilitate a range of scientific activities that could lead to new genomic- and proteomic-basedinterventions for cancer, including target identification and validation, and to develop new biomarkers,diagnostics, and pharmacogenomic analyses. Furthermore, the Core aims will serve as a focal point to helpcombine and prioritize a variety of institutional pathology systems-related development efforts, and we plan todocument and publish our findings, standard operating procedures, and best practices, to better serve theresearch community.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
2P50CA092629-06
Application #
7147039
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-GRB-I (M1))
Project Start
2005-09-26
Project End
2011-06-30
Budget Start
2005-09-26
Budget End
2007-08-31
Support Year
6
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$157,506
Indirect Cost
Name
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
Department
Type
DUNS #
064931884
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10065
Van Calster, Ben; Wynants, Laure; Verbeek, Jan F M et al. (2018) Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators. Eur Urol 74:796-804
Shoag, Jonathan; Liu, Deli; Blattner, Mirjam et al. (2018) SPOP mutation drives prostate neoplasia without stabilizing oncogenic transcription factor ERG. J Clin Invest 128:381-386
Frånlund, Maria; Arnsrud Godtman, Rebecka; Carlsson, Sigrid V et al. (2018) Prostate cancer risk assessment in men with an initial P.S.A. below 3?ng/mL: results from the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Scand J Urol 52:256-262
Mikropoulos, Christos; Selkirk, Christina G Hutten; Saya, Sibel et al. (2018) Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition. Br J Cancer 118:266-276
Capogrosso, Paolo; Vertosick, Emily A; Benfante, Nicole E et al. (2018) Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade. Eur Urol :
Lee, Justin K; Sjoberg, Daniel D; Miller, Mariam Imnadze et al. (2018) Improved Recovery of Erectile Function in Younger Men after Radical Prostatectomy: Does it Justify Immediate Surgery in Low-risk Patients? Eur Urol 73:33-37
Autio, Karen A; Dreicer, Robert; Anderson, Justine et al. (2018) Safety and Efficacy of BIND-014, a Docetaxel Nanoparticle Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 4:1344-1351
Heller, Glenn; McCormack, Robert; Kheoh, Thian et al. (2018) Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol 36:572-580
Xie, Yuanyuan; Cao, Zhen; Wong, Elissa Wp et al. (2018) COP1/DET1/ETS axis regulates ERK transcriptome and sensitivity to MAPK inhibitors. J Clin Invest 128:1442-1457
Abida, Wassim; Sawyers, Charles L (2018) Targeting DNA Repair in Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 36:1017-1019

Showing the most recent 10 out of 505 publications