Current motivational assessment instruments measure clients' attributions about their readiness to change problem behaviors. Motivation for change is typically characterized as a uni-dimensional construct, represented either by a single summative score, or by a profile of scores on scales that are believed to measure a progressive sequence of motivational stages. Although yielding important information, these data do not indicate why a particular client may be motivated for treatment, nor do they suggest how the treatment provider might maintain or improve upon the client's motivational state. Presumably, readiness to change is precipitated by specific events or pressures that impinge on a client as a result of substance abuse. These pressures may be characterized along dimensions (i.e., """"""""negative"""""""" vs. """"""""positive,"""""""" """"""""internal"""""""" vs. """"""""external""""""""""""""""), and they emanate from various biopsychosocial domains (e.g., legal, familial, financial, medical). A multi-dimensional assessment of these treatment- entry pressures would yield important information about a client's motivational state, and might suggest specific strategies for engaging and retaining the client in treatment. We defined the content domain of treatment-entry pressures by interviewing over 500 clients in diverse substance abuse treatment programs about their reasons for entering treatment. We performed a systematic content analysis of subjects' interview responses, and used these response to devise items for a standardized instrument, the """"""""Survey of Treatment-Entry Pressures"""""""" (STEP). An expert panel on test construction reviewed the items for clarity and placed them into preliminary scales according to our clearly articulated theory about the important dimensions of treatment-entry pressures. The goals of the proposed studies are to evaluate the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, factor structure, and external validity of this instrument in methadone maintenance, intensive outpatient, standard outpatient, residential, correctional, and welfare samples. The STEP is intended to fill a gap between instruments that measure functional impairment from substance abuse (e.g., the ASI), and those that measure clients' attitudes about the need for change (e.g., the URICA or SOCRATES). By connecting specific conditions in a clients life to his or her desire for change, the STEP will provide important information to clinicians and researchers about the elements and determinants of motivation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
2P50DA007705-09
Application #
6403805
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1)
Project Start
1991-09-30
Project End
2005-04-30
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2000
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Type
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Dugosh, Karen Leggett; Festinger, David S; Lynch, Kevin G et al. (2014) The Survey of Treatment Entry Pressures (STEP): identifying client's reasons for entering substance abuse treatment. J Clin Psychol 70:956-66
Denis, Cecile M; Cacciola, John S; Alterman, Arthur I (2013) Addiction Severity Index (ASI) summary scores: comparison of the Recent Status Scores of the ASI-6 and the Composite Scores of the ASI-5. J Subst Abuse Treat 45:444-50
Kessler, Felix; Cacciola, John; Alterman, Arthur et al. (2012) Psychometric properties of the sixth version of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6) in Brazil. Braz J Psychiatr 34:24-33
Cacciola, John S; Alterman, Arthur I; Habing, Brian et al. (2011) Recent status scores for version 6 of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6). Addiction 106:1588-602
Cacciola, John S; Alterman, Arthur I; Lynch, Kevin G et al. (2008) Initial reliability and validity studies of the revised Treatment Services Review (TSR-6). Drug Alcohol Depend 92:37-47
Meyers, Kathleen; Hagan, Teresa A; McDermott, Paul et al. (2006) Factor structure of the Comprehensive Adolescent Severity Inventory (CASI): results of reliability, validity, and generalizability analyses. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 32:287-310
French, Michael T; Homer, Jenny F; Nielsen, Amie L (2006) Does America spend enough on addiction treatment? Results from public opinion surveys. J Subst Abuse Treat 31:245-54
French, Michael T; Drummond, Michael (2005) A research agenda for economic evaluation of substance abuse services. J Subst Abuse Treat 29:125-37
Sindelar, Jody L; Jofre-Bonet, Mireia; French, Michael T et al. (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis of addiction treatment: paradoxes of multiple outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 73:41-50
Dismuke, Clara E; French, Michael T; Salome, Helena J et al. (2004) Out of touch or on the money: Do the clinical objectives of addiction treatment coincide with economic evaluation results? J Subst Abuse Treat 27:253-63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 44 publications