The Treatment Services Review (TSR) is a brief and assay to administer interview that elicits patient reports of the nature and frequency of treatment services. The TSR has gained wide acceptance in the substance abuse field. However, a number of factors pointed towards a need for revision of the original TSR. First, the nature of addiction treatment systems has changed and TSR items may not be representative of current treatment practices. Second, there is increasing pressure to measure the costs of providing care. Third, many researchers and administrators are looking for measures of treatment process and patient status that can be collected early in treatment and that are indicators of positive treatment outcome (i.e. performance indicators). A refined TSR could satisfy the need for easily obtainable performance indicators. Finally, the TSR would be a more efficient measure if reporting time frames of longer than 1 week were shown to be reliable and valid. The goal of the present project is to develop an improved version of the TSR (the TSR-6) that will be a more sensitive measure of current treatment service patterns, that will provide assessments of treatment services more readily associated with costs, and that will provide assessments of treatment services more readily associated with costs, and that will have measures of treatment processes and patient status assessments that can be used performance indicators. The proposed research has 5 objectives: 1) develop the revised TSR-6; 2) determine the most reliable and valid reporting time frame for the TSR-6 in three treatment modalities; 3) establish the test-retest reliability of the TSR-6; 4) examine the comparability of in-person and telephone administration of the TSR-6; 5) Evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of the treatment process and patient status TSR-6 assessments. The proposed research resolve some of the deficiencies associated with the existing TSR that have result from changes in the nature of addiction treatment systems. This research should pave the way for making the TSR a more practical and useful instrument for measuring treatment process and patient status performance indicators in both research based and community level substance abuse treatment programs

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
2P50DA007705-09
Application #
6403801
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1)
Project Start
1991-09-30
Project End
2005-04-30
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2000
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Type
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Dugosh, Karen Leggett; Festinger, David S; Lynch, Kevin G et al. (2014) The Survey of Treatment Entry Pressures (STEP): identifying client's reasons for entering substance abuse treatment. J Clin Psychol 70:956-66
Denis, Cecile M; Cacciola, John S; Alterman, Arthur I (2013) Addiction Severity Index (ASI) summary scores: comparison of the Recent Status Scores of the ASI-6 and the Composite Scores of the ASI-5. J Subst Abuse Treat 45:444-50
Kessler, Felix; Cacciola, John; Alterman, Arthur et al. (2012) Psychometric properties of the sixth version of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6) in Brazil. Braz J Psychiatr 34:24-33
Cacciola, John S; Alterman, Arthur I; Habing, Brian et al. (2011) Recent status scores for version 6 of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-6). Addiction 106:1588-602
Cacciola, John S; Alterman, Arthur I; Lynch, Kevin G et al. (2008) Initial reliability and validity studies of the revised Treatment Services Review (TSR-6). Drug Alcohol Depend 92:37-47
French, Michael T; Homer, Jenny F; Nielsen, Amie L (2006) Does America spend enough on addiction treatment? Results from public opinion surveys. J Subst Abuse Treat 31:245-54
Meyers, Kathleen; Hagan, Teresa A; McDermott, Paul et al. (2006) Factor structure of the Comprehensive Adolescent Severity Inventory (CASI): results of reliability, validity, and generalizability analyses. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 32:287-310
French, Michael T; Drummond, Michael (2005) A research agenda for economic evaluation of substance abuse services. J Subst Abuse Treat 29:125-37
Sindelar, Jody L; Jofre-Bonet, Mireia; French, Michael T et al. (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis of addiction treatment: paradoxes of multiple outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 73:41-50
Dismuke, Clara E; French, Michael T; Salome, Helena J et al. (2004) Out of touch or on the money: Do the clinical objectives of addiction treatment coincide with economic evaluation results? J Subst Abuse Treat 27:253-63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 44 publications