Project #2 Reinforcement interventions have pronounced effects on reducing cocaine use. With Center support, we developed and evaluated a low-cost reinforcement intervention, systematically moving it through the Stages of development to dissemination and broad clinical implementation. In our ongoing Center project, reinforcement interventions are yielding benefits when reinforcers are provided at treatment initiation and for longer durations. However, less than half of patients remain engaged for 12 weeks with traditional reinforcement interventions, which require frequent attendance for monitoring and reinforcing abstinence. Interventions that extend into aftercare and that are acceptable to and efficacious in preventing long-term relapse are critically needed. Reinforcement interventions are efficacious during periods they are in effect, and pilot data show that variable interval (VI) reinforcement schedules, once behavior change occurs, hold potential for maintaining gains when administered infrequently. Assessing methods to extend benefits of these interventions is of paramount scientific and clinical concern. Component Project 2 will evaluate a novel approach in which reinforcement frequency varies by patient performance. In this intervention, reinforcement will be available for 24 weeks, on a progressive VI schedule, that adapts according to patient status. Patients who maintain abstinence earn maximum reinforcers as infrequently as every three weeks on average, while frequency of monitoring and reinforcing abstinence will increase in those who relapse until abstinence is re-instated. To test efficacy, 280 patients with cocaine use disorder will be randomly assigned to: standard care (SC), SC+traditional twice weekly reinforcement, or SC+adaptive VI reinforcement. Evaluations will be completed at baseline and throughout 18 months to assess objective and self-reported indices of drug use, psychosocial problems, and HIV risk behaviors. Primary hypotheses are (1) the adaptive VI reinforcement intervention will improve outcomes relative to standard care during the treatment period and throughout follow-up, and (2) the adaptive VI reinforcement intervention will improve outcomes relative to the traditional reinforcement system. This study will also evaluate the roles of cognitive control and reactivity to monetary rewards and their neural correlates in treatment outcome. Patients with better cognitive control are expected to maintain longer durations of abstinence across conditions. Patients with greater sensitivity to monetary rewards are expected to achieve greater durations of abstinence in reinforcement conditions. If these measures differentially relate to outcomes across treatments, such results suggest the potential of pairing reinforcement interventions to individuals most likely to benefit from them;they may also indicate possible biomarkers of response in a treatment-specific manner. If cognitive indices mediate treatment response, future studies can refine interventions to improve cognitive processes and long-term outcomes.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1-EXL-T (03))
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Yale University
New Haven
United States
Zip Code
Yip, Sarah W; Potenza, Marc N (2018) Application of Research Domain Criteria to childhood and adolescent impulsive and addictive disorders: Implications for treatment. Clin Psychol Rev 64:41-56
Rash, Carla J; Petry, Nancy M; Alessi, Sheila M (2018) A randomized trial of contingency management for smoking cessation in the homeless. Psychol Addict Behav 32:141-148
Carroll, Kathleen M; Nich, Charla; DeVito, Elise E et al. (2018) Galantamine and Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cocaine Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Psychiatry 79:
Kiluk, Brian D; Nich, Charla; Buck, Matthew B et al. (2018) Randomized Clinical Trial of Computerized and Clinician-Delivered CBT in Comparison With Standard Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Primary Within-Treatment and Follow-Up Outcomes. Am J Psychiatry 175:853-863
Paris, Manuel; Silva, Michelle; AƱez-Nava, Luis et al. (2018) Culturally Adapted, Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Spanish-Speaking Individuals With Substance Use Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Public Health 108:1535-1542
Carroll, Kathleen M; Nich, Charla; Frankforter, Tami L et al. (2018) Accounting for the uncounted: Physical and affective distress in individuals dropping out of oral naltrexone treatment for opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 192:264-270
DeVito, Elise E; Kiluk, Brian D; Nich, Charla et al. (2018) Drug Stroop: Mechanisms of response to computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for cocaine dependence in a randomized clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 183:162-168
Petry, Nancy M; Alessi, Sheila M; Rash, Carla J et al. (2018) A randomized trial of contingency management reinforcing attendance at treatment: Do duration and timing of reinforcement matter? J Consult Clin Psychol 86:799-809
Jensen, Kevin P; DeVito, Elise E; Yip, Sarah et al. (2018) The Cholinergic System as a Treatment Target for Opioid Use Disorder. CNS Drugs 32:981-996
Boswell, Rebecca G; Sun, Wendy; Suzuki, Shosuke et al. (2018) Training in cognitive strategies reduces eating and improves food choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E11238-E11247

Showing the most recent 10 out of 533 publications