SPATIAL CONTROL OF INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING (Lee Bardwell, Theme Leader) | Some of the greatest mysteries in biological spafial dynamics lie at the subcellular level. The successes of biochemical and reconstitution-based assays in explaining fundamental mechanisms of cell biology have madeit easy to lose sight of the fact that cells are not just bags of well-sfirred enzymes. With respect to intracellular signaling pathways, there is growing evidence that spatial control is crucial to normal function [192-194] and occurs at many scales: compartments (plasma memtjrane, nucleus);sub-compartments (e.g. membrane rafts and nuclear speckles) and, below these levels, the nano-spafial scale, defined by local tethering interactions. Such spatial regulation is necessarily dynamic: scaffold proteins move to the plasma membrane, kinases and transcription factors move into or out of the nucleus, tethering interactions are regulated by phosphorylation, etc. In addifion, motor-based transport is used both to construct compartments, and to transport signaling molecules during sfimulafion;in turn this transport is regulated by extra- and intracellular cues. Yet for all the evidence that space matters, we often know less about spatial dynamics inside cells than outside of them. We propose three projects that deal with distinct,aspects of intracellular spatial dynamics, but are linked by their reliance on novel, cutting-edge optical, bioinformatic, and modeling methodologies. All three seek to open new lines of inquiry and, as such, incur more than a little technical risk. We believe the risks are justified by the expected gains in discovery and understanding in such a pooriy understood, yet extremely important, area.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZGM1-CBCB-3)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of California Irvine
United States
Zip Code
Staaf, Elina; Hedde, Per Niklas; Bagawath Singh, Sunitha et al. (2018) Educated natural killer cells show dynamic movement of the activating receptor NKp46 and confinement of the inhibitory receptor Ly49A. Sci Signal 11:
Santos, Rommel A; Fuertes, Ariel J C; Short, Ginger et al. (2018) DSCAM differentially modulates pre- and postsynaptic structural and functional central connectivity during visual system wiring. Neural Dev 13:22
Koay, Eugene J; Lee, Yeonju; Cristini, Vittorio et al. (2018) A Visually Apparent and Quantifiable CT Imaging Feature Identifies Biophysical Subtypes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 24:5883-5894
MacLean, Adam L; Hong, Tian; Nie, Qing (2018) Exploring intermediate cell states through the lens of single cells. Curr Opin Syst Biol 9:32-41
Mäntylä, Elina; Chacko, Jenu V; Aho, Vesa et al. (2018) Viral highway to nucleus exposed by image correlation analyses. Sci Rep 8:1152
Yan, Huaming; Romero-López, Mónica; Benitez, Lesly I et al. (2018) Multiscale modeling of glioblastoma. Transl Cancer Res 7:S96-S98
Lei, Jinzhi; Nie, Qing; Chen, Dong-Bao (2018) A single-cell epigenetic model for paternal psychological stress-induced transgenerational reprogramming in offspring. Biol Reprod 98:846-855
Huang, Jian; Chen, Long; Rui, Hongxing (2018) Multigrid Methods for A Mixed Finite Element Method of The Darcy-Forchheimer Model. J Sci Comput 74:396-411
Mahlbacher, Grace; Curtis, Louis T; Lowengrub, John et al. (2018) Mathematical modeling of tumor-associated macrophage interactions with the cancer microenvironment. J Immunother Cancer 6:10
McLelland, Bryce T; Lin, Bin; Mathur, Anuradha et al. (2018) Transplanted hESC-Derived Retina Organoid Sheets Differentiate, Integrate, and Improve Visual Function in Retinal Degenerate Rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:2586-2603

Showing the most recent 10 out of 404 publications