5. PROJECT 1. DYNAMICS IN DECISION MAKING: HOW CELLULAR NETWORKS ENCODE AND DECODE TEMPORAL INFORMATION SUMMARY There is growing evidence that the dynamics of signaling ? how the activity of specific pathways changes as a function of time ? may play a central role in the specificity of cellular information transmission. One general hypothesis is that distinct external inputs (different growth factors, stresses, etc.) can encode information in the dynamics of how central signaling nodes are activated (i.e. sustained vs transient activation; different frequency activation). In turn, these distinct dynamic properties could be decoded by downstream networks in order to yield distinct cellular response programs. Nonetheless, this dynamic encoding hypothesis has been difficult to test, because we have lacked the tools to systematically perturb signaling dynamics. We have recently developed a suite of cellular optogenetic switches that allow us to activate key intracellular regulatory nodes with light (e.g. Ras, MAPK, cAMP, transcription). Because we can use light to activate these nodes with arbitrary temporal patterns, they are powerful tools to systematically interrogate how cells encode and decode dynamical information. We propose to combine systematic optogenetic stimulation with quantitative response profiling to study a number of canonical cellular decision making systems (mammalian cell proliferation, yeast stress responses, and stem cell differentiation). These studies will give us a deeper quantitative understanding of how cellular information can be encoded in signaling dynamics. In addition, they should provide a basis for a deeper understanding of how changes in dynamics play a role in diseases such as cancer and how dynamic stimulation might also provide new modalities to modulate and control cellular behavior, especially in engineered therapeutic cells (e.g. PROJECT 3 includes engineering dynamic control of stem cell differentiation). We also hope to learn how to engineer signaling networks that can act as specific dynamic filters. LEAD Investigator: EL-SAMAD Investigators: EL-SAMAD, LIM, THOMSON, KROGAN, LI
| Bugaj, L J; Sabnis, A J; Mitchell, A et al. (2018) Cancer mutations and targeted drugs can disrupt dynamic signal encoding by the Ras-Erk pathway. Science 361: |
| Obernier, Kirsten; Cebrian-Silla, Arantxa; Thomson, Matthew et al. (2018) Adult Neurogenesis Is Sustained by Symmetric Self-Renewal and Differentiation. Cell Stem Cell 22:221-234.e8 |
| Toda, Satoshi; Blauch, Lucas R; Tang, Sindy K Y et al. (2018) Programming self-organizing multicellular structures with synthetic cell-cell signaling. Science 361:156-162 |
| Datta, Anirban; Sandilands, Emma; Mostov, Keith E et al. (2017) Fibroblast-derived HGF drives acinar lung cancer cell polarization through integrin-dependent RhoA-ROCK1 inhibition. Cell Signal 40:91-98 |
| Bugaj, Lukasz J; O'Donoghue, Geoff P; Lim, Wendell A (2017) Interrogating cellular perception and decision making with optogenetic tools. J Cell Biol 216:25-28 |
| Tsvetanova, Nikoleta G; Trester-Zedlitz, Michelle; Newton, Billy W et al. (2017) G Protein-Coupled Receptor Endocytosis Confers Uniformity in Responses to Chemically Distinct Ligands. Mol Pharmacol 91:145-156 |
| Srinivas, Niranjan; Parkin, James; Seelig, Georg et al. (2017) Enzyme-free nucleic acid dynamical systems. Science 358: |
| Stewart-Ornstein, Jacob; Chen, Susan; Bhatnagar, Rajat et al. (2017) Model-guided optogenetic study of PKA signaling in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 28:221-227 |
| Tsai, Yu-Hwai; Nattiv, Roy; Dedhia, Priya H et al. (2017) In vitro patterning of pluripotent stem cell-derived intestine recapitulates in vivo human development. Development 144:1045-1055 |
| Aranda-Díaz, Andrés; Mace, Kieran; Zuleta, Ignacio et al. (2017) Robust Synthetic Circuits for Two-Dimensional Control of Gene Expression in Yeast. ACS Synth Biol 6:545-554 |
Showing the most recent 10 out of 183 publications
