State Mental Health Authorities are the primary government entity responsible for organizing, financing and delivering services to persons with severe mental illness. States require information on the efficiency and effectiveness of their management strategies. Mental health services research, one source of this information, has had less impact on state management and policy than would be optimal. In part, the disjuncture between research and policy results from the process of studying interventions and populations outside of policy contexts. In the proposed Center for the Study of Issues in Public Mental Health, we plan to address this historical disjuncture. The strengths of the Center will be its structure, its faculty and its laboratory. The Center will be located within a State Mental Health Authority (SMHA) and structured as a strong Public-Academic collaboration. Its faculty will include state mental health services researchers, state and local policy staff, consumers of mental health services and researchers from the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy. Its laboratory will be the public mental health system in New York State where we will develop a program of research explicitly focused on the state mental health system - its priority populations, initiatives and the methodologies needed to understand them. An Advisory Board composed of national leaders from each major mental health constituency will critique the Center research and dissemination strategies and help to assure the national relevance and impact of the work. The Center will have three research Cores: Populations, System Initiatives and Methodology. In the Populations Core researchers will study multiple need populations from the individual's perspective. Research will emphasize an understanding of the formal and informal system of services and supports that these individuals negotiate in their daily life. The System Initiatives Core faculty will investigate SMHA strategies that mirror national trends in health and welfare for organizing, financing and delivering services' in community settings. In the Methodology Core, researchers will develop techniques that are responsive to the complex environment in which mental health services.are designed, implemented and studied. In each Core, researchers, policy staff and consumers will work collaboratively to develop, implement and interpret studies that are both rigorous and relevant. Six differing dissemination strategies will be used to reach the Center's multiple audiences. The Center, then, will provide a setting, a structure and a staff to develop a research program that will inform the scientific and policy communities who, along with consumers of service, strive to better understand and serve individuals with severe mental illness.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Specialized Center (P50)
Project #
5P50MH051359-03
Application #
2250611
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (SRCM)
Project Start
1993-09-30
Project End
1998-08-31
Budget Start
1995-09-01
Budget End
1996-08-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
1995
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
New York State Office of Mental Health
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Albany
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
12204
Hopper, Kim (2007) Rethinking social recovery in schizophrenia: what a capabilities approach might offer. Soc Sci Med 65:868-79
Bertollo, David N; Alexander, Mary Jane; Shinn, Marybeth et al. (2007) Innovations: clinical computing: an audio computer-assisted self-interviewing system for research and screening in public mental health settings. Psychiatr Serv 58:743-5
Siegel, Carole E; Laska, Eugene; Meisner, Morris (2004) Estimating capacity requirements for mental health services after a disaster has occurred: a call for new data. Am J Public Health 94:582-5
Siegel, Carole; Wanderling, Joseph; Laska, Eugene (2004) Coping with disasters: estimation of additional capacity of the mental health sector to meet extended service demands. J Ment Health Policy Econ 7:29-35
Laska, Eugene M; Meisner, Morris; Wanderling, Joseph et al. (2003) Estimating population size and duplication rates when records cannot be linked. Stat Med 22:3403-17
Siegel, Carole; Haugland, Gary; Chambers, Ethel Davis (2003) Performance measures and their benchmarks for assessing organizational cultural competency in behavioral health care service delivery. Adm Policy Ment Health 31:141-70
Meisner, Morris; Laska, Eugene M; Siegel, Carole et al. (2002) The familywise error rate of a simultaneous confidence band for the incremental net health benefit. Health Econ 11:275-80
Laska, Eugene M; Meisner, Morris; Siegel, Carole et al. (2002) Statistical determination of cost-effectiveness frontier based on net health benefits. Health Econ 11:249-64
Laska, E M; Meisner, M; Siegel, C et al. (2001) Statistical cost-effectiveness analysis of two treatments based on net health benefits. Stat Med 20:1279-302
Markowitz, F E (2001) Modeling processes in recovery from mental illness: relationships between symptoms, life satisfaction, and self-concept. J Health Soc Behav 42:64-79

Showing the most recent 10 out of 18 publications