Positive affect improves, but depression impairs, performance on tasks of executive function (Levin et al., inpress). Extreme emotions are not necessary for these effects: even mild conditions of positive affect orfeeling down have observable influences on the way in which people process information. We have arguedthat the mechanism of these effects depends on emotion-dependent changes in regional brain activity thateither enhance or impair performance, depending on the role that a particular brain region plays in theimplementation of a task. To date, however, there has been no systematic evaluation of the impact ofspecific emotional states on executive function, nor has there been an assessment of the brain activityinvolved. The present project, based at U. Illinois, will examine both state and trait contributions of emotion toexecutive function and has two specific aims. In the first, the effects of state emotion on brain activity will beassessed by inducing mood measuring fMRI during the color-word Stroop task. Our model of regional brainactivity during emotional processing will be integrated with Banich's cascade model of attentional control. Inaddition, we will examine the effect of simulated emotional states on the computational model developed inProject 1.
The second aim i s to integrate our model of brain organization for different emotions with U.Colorado colleagues' model delineating subcomponents of executive function (inhibition, shifting, andupdating). Neuroimaging findings suggest that there are both common and distinct neural networks involvedacross the domains (Collette et al., 2005). Activity in these same neural networks has been implicated in ourmodels of emotional experience and regulation. These data suggest that different emotions may beasssociated with distinct patterns of impaired or enhanced executive function. The focus of Aim 2 is toexamine the influence of trait emotion on executive function by selecting people who score high on affectivedimensions that we have shown to be associated with distinct patterns of brain activity as measured by fMRIand ERPs. Understanding the ways that both state and trait affect might influence cognitive processes andassociated patterns of brain activity will provide insight into common everyday experiences as well asemotion/cognition interactions associated with individual differences in personality traits that might be relatedto current or future depressive episodes.
|Vargas, Teresa; Snyder, Hannah; Banich, Marie et al. (2018) Altered selection during language processing in individuals at high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res 202:303-309|
|Popov, Tzvetan; Westner, Britta U; Silton, Rebecca L et al. (2018) Time Course of Brain Network Reconfiguration Supporting Inhibitory Control. J Neurosci 38:4348-4356|
|Szekely, Akos; Silton, Rebecca L; Heller, Wendy et al. (2017) Differential functional connectivity of rostral anterior cingulate cortex during emotional interference. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 12:476-486|
|Medrano, Paolo; Nyhus, Erika; Smolen, Andrew et al. (2017) Individual differences in EEG correlates of recognition memory due to DAT polymorphisms. Brain Behav 7:e00870|
|Benca, Chelsie E; Derringer, Jaime L; Corley, Robin P et al. (2017) Predicting Cognitive Executive Functioning with Polygenic Risk Scores for Psychiatric Disorders. Behav Genet 47:11-24|
|Burdwood, Erin N; Infantolino, Zachary P; Crocker, Laura D et al. (2016) Resting-state functional connectivity differentiates anxious apprehension and anxious arousal. Psychophysiology 53:1451-9|
|Pauli, Wolfgang M; O'Reilly, Randall C; Yarkoni, Tal et al. (2016) Regional specialization within the human striatum for diverse psychological functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:1907-12|
|Reineberg, Andrew E; Banich, Marie T (2016) Functional connectivity at rest is sensitive to individual differences in executive function: A network analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2959-75|
|Bredemeier, Keith; Warren, Stacie L; Berenbaum, Howard et al. (2016) Executive function deficits associated with current and past major depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 204:226-33|
|Depue, B E; Orr, J M; Smolker, H R et al. (2016) The Organization of Right Prefrontal Networks Reveals Common Mechanisms of Inhibitory Regulation Across Cognitive, Emotional, and Motor Processes. Cereb Cortex 26:1634-1646|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 92 publications