Reduced cholinergic function in the central nervous system contributes to memory disturbances, including those associated with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Previous studies by ourselves and others have demonstrated conclusively that distinct subtypes of muscarinic receptors are present in varying proportions in different brain regions. Classical receptor theory dictates that the most useful receptor classification schemes be based on the affinities of antagonists. The only antagonist that displays heterogeneous binding profiles and has been extensively characterized in response assays is pirenzipine; therefore, there is some reason for concern that the results obtained may reflect anomalous properties of this single compound, rather than an underlying pharmacology. Further, the characterizations may have been confounded by tissue-related differences, as the different responses were studied in different tissues. This proposal intends to correlate sophisticated assays of binding and response in model in vitro systems so as to relate the responses to given subpopulations. One line of investigation will evaluate multiple muscarinic responses and receptor binding in parallel, in identical preparations (neurally derived cell lines); thereby, the problems of between-tissue differences will be eliminated and the affinities of a given antagonist in the different response assays and binding assays can be compared directly. A second approach will examine a single response in regions of the brain that possess very different distributions of subpopulations, as a test of the uniformity of the relationship between response and receptor subtype. In both of these approaches, receptor subtypes will be defined according to the affinities of pirenzipine and other antagonists (e.g. gallamine, clozapine), characterized in our ongoing evaluation of potentially selective muscarinic ligands. Furthermore, the results of classical pharmacological methods, such as Schild analysis of competitive antagonists, will be supplemented by an independent procedure: selective protection of given subpopulation(s) of receptors from irreversible blockade by alkylating antagonists. Selective protection is a powerful technique that can also be used to determine the relationships between the subpopulations defined by different selective ligands and to evaluate the response characteristics of agonist-defined subpopulations. It is expected that these studies will lead to the development of agents with greater selectivity toward muscarinic subpopulations and that this knowledge may foster the development of newer and safer approaches to the enhancement of cognitive performance.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AG005214-02
Application #
3115767
Study Section
Neurology B Subcommittee 1 (NEUB)
Project Start
1985-02-01
Project End
1988-01-31
Budget Start
1986-02-01
Budget End
1987-01-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1986
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Vermont & St Agric College
Department
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
066811191
City
Burlington
State
VT
Country
United States
Zip Code
05405
Shivnaraine, Rabindra V; Kelly, Brendan; Sankar, Krishana S et al. (2016) Allosteric modulation in monomers and oligomers of a G protein-coupled receptor. Elife 5:
Redka, Dar'ya S; Morizumi, Takefumi; Elmslie, Gwendolynne et al. (2014) Coupling of g proteins to reconstituted monomers and tetramers of the M2 muscarinic receptor. J Biol Chem 289:24347-65
Shivnaraine, Rabindra V; Huang, Xi-Ping; Seidenberg, Margaret et al. (2012) Heterotropic cooperativity within and between protomers of an oligomeric M(2) muscarinic receptor. Biochemistry 51:4518-40
Stahl, Edward; Elmslie, Gwendolynne; Ellis, John (2011) Allosteric modulation of the M? muscarinic receptor by amiodarone and N-ethylamiodarone: application of the four-ligand allosteric two-state model. Mol Pharmacol 80:378-88
Stahl, Edward; Ellis, John (2010) Novel allosteric effects of amiodarone at the muscarinic M5 receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 334:214-22
Prilla, Stefanie; Schrobang, Jasmin; Ellis, John et al. (2006) Allosteric interactions with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: complex role of the conserved tryptophan M2422Trp in a critical cluster of amino acids for baseline affinity, subtype selectivity, and cooperativity. Mol Pharmacol 70:181-93
Huang, Xi-Ping; Prilla, Stefanie; Mohr, Klaus et al. (2005) Critical amino acid residues of the common allosteric site on the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: more similarities than differences between the structurally divergent agents gallamine and bis(ammonio)alkane-type hexamethylene-bis-[dimethyl-(3-phtha Mol Pharmacol 68:769-78
Trankle, Christian; Dittmann, Andreas; Schulz, Uwe et al. (2005) Atypical muscarinic allosteric modulation: cooperativity between modulators and their atypical binding topology in muscarinic M2 and M2/M5 chimeric receptors. Mol Pharmacol 68:1597-610
Voigtlander, Uta; Johren, Kirstin; Mohr, Marion et al. (2003) Allosteric site on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: identification of two amino acids in the muscarinic M2 receptor that account entirely for the M2/M5 subtype selectivities of some structurally diverse allosteric ligands in N-methylscopolamine-occupie Mol Pharmacol 64:21-31
Ford, Diane J; Essex, Anthony; Spalding, Tracy A et al. (2002) Homologous mutations near the junction of the sixth transmembrane domain and the third extracellular loop lead to constitutive activity and enhanced agonist affinity at all muscarinic receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300:810-7

Showing the most recent 10 out of 30 publications