Favored Sites for HIV cDNA Integration in the Human Genome Abstract In order to replicate, a retrovirus must integrate a DNA copy of its RNA genome into a chromosome of the host cell. The question of how retroviruses select genomic sites for DNA integration has long interested retrovirologists, because studies in this area provide a unique window on replication mechanism and inform design of potential antiviral therapy. We have investigated integration targeting in detail, taking advantage of new high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic methods. Studies of integration targeting have emphasized the importance of a new cellular factor LEDGF/p75, which has in turn suggested new routes to designing inhibitors. Highlights of published data from the previous funding period include the findings that 1) HIV favors integration in active transcription units, 2) other retroviruses, in contrast, show different favored genomic integration sites, 3) the cellular protein PSIP1/LEDGF/p75, which binds tightly to HIV integrase (IN), helps guide HIV integration into transcription units, 4) swapping the MLV IN coding region into HIV causes the HIVmIN chimera to integrate with the specificity of MLV, 5) applying the ultra-high throughput pyrosequencing method has allowed 40,761 unique HIV integration sites to be determined, revealing that integration takes place on histones in chromosomal DNA and that histone post-translational modifications are important determinants of HIV integration site selection in vivo.
Our Specific Aims for the renewal are as follows.
In Aim 1, we will study integration site selection by tethering of integration complexes to cellular factors. We will extend our studies of the HIV IN binding protein PSIP1/LEDGF/p75 to investigate the mechanisms by which this factor promotes integration efficiency and guides integration targeting. We will also use genomic methods to identify additional candidate factors important in HIV integration, and biochemical methods to study their mechanisms.
In Aim 2, we will investigate the influence of chromatin structure on integration, with a focus on extending the observations from pyrosequencing data mentioned above.
In Aim 3, we will investigate the possible role of cell cycle progression in integration targeting. In the previous funding cycle, our data sets and methods were used extensively by other laboratories--in the renewal, we aim to contribute an even richer set of resources to the field.

Public Health Relevance

The attached grant application is designed to improve our understanding of HIV DNA integration. The integration system is a target for antiviral agents, and the proposed experiments should provide information directly useful for designing inhibitors.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01AI052845-09
Application #
7749525
Study Section
AIDS Molecular and Cellular Biology Study Section (AMCB)
Program Officer
Sharma, Opendra K
Project Start
2002-06-01
Project End
2013-01-31
Budget Start
2010-02-01
Budget End
2011-01-31
Support Year
9
Fiscal Year
2010
Total Cost
$335,699
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Microbiology/Immun/Virology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Clarke, Erik L; Connell, A Jesse; Six, Emmanuelle et al. (2018) T cell dynamics and response of the microbiota after gene therapy to treat X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Genome Med 10:70
Veenhuis, Rebecca T; Kwaa, Abena K; Garliss, Caroline C et al. (2018) Long-term remission despite clonal expansion of replication-competent HIV-1 isolates. JCI Insight 3:
Sherman, Eric; Nobles, Christopher; Berry, Charles C et al. (2017) INSPIIRED: A Pipeline for Quantitative Analysis of Sites of New DNA Integration in Cellular Genomes. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 4:39-49
Chehoud, Christel; Stieh, Daniel J; Bailey, Aubrey G et al. (2017) Associations of the vaginal microbiota with HIV infection, bacterial vaginosis, and demographic factors. AIDS 31:895-904
Berry, Charles C; Nobles, Christopher; Six, Emmanuelle et al. (2017) INSPIIRED: Quantification and Visualization Tools for Analyzing Integration Site Distributions. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 4:17-26
Feng, Lei; Dharmarajan, Venkatasubramanian; Serrao, Erik et al. (2016) The Competitive Interplay between Allosteric HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor BI/D and LEDGF/p75 during the Early Stage of HIV-1 Replication Adversely Affects Inhibitor Potency. ACS Chem Biol 11:1313-21
Gupta, Kushol; Turkki, Vesa; Sherrill-Mix, Scott et al. (2016) Structural Basis for Inhibitor-Induced Aggregation of HIV Integrase. PLoS Biol 14:e1002584
Ocwieja, Karen E; Sherrill-Mix, Scott; Liu, Changchun et al. (2015) A reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay optimized to detect multiple HIV subtypes. PLoS One 10:e0117852
Pache, Lars; Dutra, Miriam S; Spivak, Adam M et al. (2015) BIRC2/cIAP1 Is a Negative Regulator of HIV-1 Transcription and Can Be Targeted by Smac Mimetics to Promote Reversal of Viral Latency. Cell Host Microbe 18:345-53
Aiyer, Sriram; Rossi, Paolo; Malani, Nirav et al. (2015) Structural and sequencing analysis of local target DNA recognition by MLV integrase. Nucleic Acids Res 43:5647-63

Showing the most recent 10 out of 72 publications