This competing continuation interactive R01 is being submitted by Duke University Medical Center as one of five sites to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Screening Consortium. The other sites include: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, RAND-UCLA, State University of New York at Stony Brook, and the University of Massachusetts. This proposal makes a unique contribution to the Consortium by examining how different modes of conveying colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factors affects CRC screening among a high risk occupational group, carpenters. Carpenters are exposed to occupational health hazards (e.g., asbestos, wood dust, solvents) and engage in lifestyle behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol use) that may increase their CRC risk. This proposal assesses whether an intervention that highlights and communicates to carpenters these occupational hazards and behavioral risk factors via different modalities (e.g., brochures, telephone counseling) motivates CRC screening. With the aid of the New Jersey Carpenters Trust, the main aims are to assess whether: 1) informing carpenters ages 50 and older about occupational and behavioral risk factors related to CRC, in addition to generic risk factors (e.g., age, family history, polyps), produces incremental increases in CRC screening as compared to providing them with generic risk information only; and 2) the use of targeted telephone counseling, as a motivational adjunct, produces incremental increases in CRC screening as compared to written educational materials. It is expected that carpenters who receive written information about occupational and behavioral risk factors along with telephone counseling that personalizes these risks will have the highest CRC screening rates. This proposal will address the Consortium aims of assessing: 1) the effectiveness of targeted telephone counseling versus a control (e.g., usual care) group; 2) sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics comparing users versus underusers of CRC screening, and 3) the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. This site will develop the targeted telephone counseling to be used among the other Consortium members. This theoretically driven intervention will target individuals at a stage when risk perceptions are hypothesized to be most influential at initiating behavioral change. The results will: 1) provide much needed information about the efficacy of different modalities of communicating general, behavioral and occupation-related CRC risk factors, and 2) aid in the design of future CRC screening interventions among high risk occupational groups that capitalize on risk communication messages. Such interventions are especially needed among blue-collar workers who are more likely to be exposed to environmental carcinogens and engage in behavioral risk factors that increase CRC risk.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01CA063782-10
Application #
6633160
Study Section
Community Prevention and Control Study Section (CPC)
Program Officer
Breslau, Erica S
Project Start
1993-09-30
Project End
2005-11-30
Budget Start
2003-06-01
Budget End
2005-11-30
Support Year
10
Fiscal Year
2003
Total Cost
$398,001
Indirect Cost
Name
Duke University
Department
Type
Schools of Nursing
DUNS #
044387793
City
Durham
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27705
Adams, Rebecca N; Mosher, Catherine E; Blair, Cindy K et al. (2015) Cancer survivors' uptake and adherence in diet and exercise intervention trials: an integrative data analysis. Cancer 121:77-83
Ottenbacher, Allison; Sloane, Richard; Snyder, Denise C et al. (2013) Cancer-specific concerns and physical activity among recently diagnosed breast and prostate cancer survivors. Integr Cancer Ther 12:206-12
Mosher, Catherine E; Lipkus, Isaac; Sloane, Richard et al. (2013) Long-term outcomes of the FRESH START trial: exploring the role of self-efficacy in cancer survivors' maintenance of dietary practices and physical activity. Psychooncology 22:876-85
Ottenbacher, Allison J; Day, R Sue; Taylor, Wendell C et al. (2012) Long-term physical activity outcomes of home-based lifestyle interventions among breast and prostate cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 20:2483-9
Wilkinson, Anna V; Barrera, Stephanie L; McBride, Colleen M et al. (2012) Extant health behaviors and uptake of standardized vs tailored health messages among cancer survivors enrolled in the FRESH START trial: a comparison of fighting-spirits vs fatalists. Psychooncology 21:108-13
Ottenbacher, Allison J; Day, R Sue; Taylor, Wendell C et al. (2011) Exercise among breast and prostate cancer survivors--what are their barriers? J Cancer Surviv 5:413-9
Christy, Shannon M; Mosher, Catherine E; Sloane, Richard et al. (2011) Long-term dietary outcomes of the FRESH START intervention for breast and prostate cancer survivors. J Am Diet Assoc 111:1844-51
Sloane, Richard; Snyder, Denise Clutter; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy et al. (2009) Comparing the 7-day physical activity recall with a triaxial accelerometer for measuring time in exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:1334-40
Snyder, Denise Clutter; Sloane, Richard; Lobach, David et al. (2008) Differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes at 1- and 2-year follow-up of cancer survivors accrued via self-referral versus cancer registry in the FRESH START Diet and exercise trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17:1288-94
Mosher, Catherine E; Fuemmeler, Bernard F; Sloane, Richard et al. (2008) Change in self-efficacy partially mediates the effects of the FRESH START intervention on cancer survivors'dietary outcomes. Psychooncology 17:1014-23

Showing the most recent 10 out of 35 publications