Precise temporal control of mesenchymal differentiation into bone and cartilage is essential for proper development of the craniofacial skeleton. Premature differentiation within cranial sutures produces craniosynostoses whereas delayed differentiation leads to fontanel defects associated with cleidocranial and campomelic dysplasias. Thus, identifying cellular and molecular mechanisms that control the timing of skeletal differentiation is a prerequisite for preventing birth defects. Two molecules that play critical roles during skeletal differentiation are runx2 and sox9, which are required for bone and cartilage respectively. What remain unclear are mechanisms that define the temporal expression of runx2 and sox9, and establish exactly when bone and cartilage differentiate. The proposed research addresses this issue by manipulating the relative age of mesenchyme and by altering the regulation of runx2 and sox9. Quail and duck embryos have divergent growth rates and orthotopic transplants of neural crest cells destined to form the craniofacial skeleton reveal that quail donor cells differentiate into bone and cartilage earlier than duck host mesenchyme as evidenced by expression of runx2 and sox9. Three approaches are taken to test the hypothesis that neural crest mesenchyme establishes the timing of skeletal differentiation by regulating the expression of, and governing its own response to, and signals that control runx2 and sox9. Each approach involves generating chimeric embryos with either older donor mesenchyme within a relatively younger host, or younger donor mesenchyme within a relatively older host.
Specific Aim 1 involves in vitro experiments to determine when tissue interactions are required for bone and cartilage formation, and to assess the extent to which neural crest cells govern these interactions.
Specific Aim 2 identifies neural crest-dependent signaling events involving FGF and TGFbeta family members and their targets, which regulate runx2 and sox9 expression, and govern the timing of skeletal differentiation.
Specific Aim 3 ascertains the potential of FGF and TGFbeta family members to control the timing of skeletal differentiation by employing gain- and loss-of-function approaches to regulate bone and cartilage formation. One important goal is to """"""""rescue"""""""" the premature or delayed skeletal differentiation in chimeras, which has clear clinical implications for devising molecular-based therapies to treat disorders that affect the timing of skeletal differentiation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01DE016402-01
Application #
6861217
Study Section
Skeletal Biology Development and Disease Study Section (SBDD)
Program Officer
Small, Rochelle K
Project Start
2004-09-28
Project End
2008-08-31
Budget Start
2004-09-28
Budget End
2005-08-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2004
Total Cost
$293,856
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California San Francisco
Department
Orthopedics
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
094878337
City
San Francisco
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
94143
Schneider, Richard A (2018) Neural crest and the origin of species-specific pattern. Genesis 56:e23219
Hughes, Alex J; Miyazaki, Hikaru; Coyle, Maxwell C et al. (2018) Engineered Tissue Folding by Mechanical Compaction of the Mesenchyme. Dev Cell 44:165-178.e6
Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R; Geiger, Madeleine; Schneider, Richard A (2016) The taming of the neural crest: a developmental perspective on the origins of morphological covariation in domesticated mammals. R Soc Open Sci 3:160107
Smith, Francis J; Percival, Christopher J; Young, Nathan M et al. (2015) Divergence of craniofacial developmental trajectories among avian embryos. Dev Dyn 244:1158-1167
Parchem, Ronald J; Moore, Nicole; Fish, Jennifer L et al. (2015) miR-302 Is Required for Timing of Neural Differentiation, Neural Tube Closure, and Embryonic Viability. Cell Rep 12:760-73
Ealba, Erin L; Jheon, Andrew H; Hall, Jane et al. (2015) Neural crest-mediated bone resorption is a determinant of species-specific jaw length. Dev Biol 408:151-63
Fish, Jennifer L; Sklar, Rachel S; Woronowicz, Katherine C et al. (2014) Multiple developmental mechanisms regulate species-specific jaw size. Development 141:674-84
Hall, Jane; Jheon, Andrew H; Ealba, Erin L et al. (2014) Evolution of a developmental mechanism: Species-specific regulation of the cell cycle and the timing of events during craniofacial osteogenesis. Dev Biol 385:380-95
Young, Nathan M; Hu, Diane; Lainoff, Alexis J et al. (2014) Embryonic bauplans and the developmental origins of facial diversity and constraint. Development 141:1059-63
Fish, Jennifer L; Schneider, Richard A (2014) Assessing species-specific contributions to craniofacial development using quail-duck chimeras. J Vis Exp :

Showing the most recent 10 out of 28 publications