What enables a baby's brain to learn so rapidly during early developmental critical periods? What cell and molecular mechanisms cause the decline in extensive plasticity by adulthood? The goal here is to enhance synaptic plasticity by discovering and then blocking endogenous mechanisms that function to suppress plasticity and circuit change. Specifically, can manipulations of the neuronal receptor PirB (Paired Immunoglobulin-like receptor B;Lilrb3 in humans) """"""""release the brake"""""""" on ocular dominance (OD) plasticity, a form of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in visual cortex? In the immune system PirB is a receptor for Major Histocompatibility Class I molecules, famous ligands for T-cell receptors. This Lab made the unexpected discovery that neurons express PirB and MHCI molecules at synapses. OD plasticity is enhanced in visual cortex of mice with germline deletion of PirB, consistent with PirB acting to brake synaptic plasticity.
Three specific aims are proposed: 1) Determine if acute deletion of PirB postnatally enhances OD plasticity: A conditional allele of PirB (PirB flox/flox) has been made, allowing acute temporal and cell-type disruption of PirB by crossing mice with tamoxifen-inducible Cre transgenic lines. Direct blockade of PirB with recombinant soluble truncated PirB protein or function-blocking antibodies will also be used. These experiments should reveal when and in what cell types PirB acts. 2) Link enhanced OD plasticity in PirB-/- mice to cellular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) will be studied in vitro in visual cortex slices using physiological methods. Dendritic spine density of YFP-labeled layer 5 pyramidal neurons will be measured in PirB-/- vs WT mice reared with normal visual experience or with monocular eye closure;spine stability will be examined using two-photon microscopy. These experiments should broaden understanding of how PirB acts at synaptic and structural levels to suppress plasticity. 3) Identify PirB signal transduction pathways in mouse visual cortex: Candidate signaling pathways downstream of PirB will be identified and evaluated by comparing visually-driven signaling in WT vs germline PirB-/- mouse visual cortex during and after the critical period. Changes in expression and phosphorylation levels will be assessed in candidate pathways including MAP Kinase, AKT and mTOR signaling. Studies here will employ genetic, biochemical, electrophysiological, imaging and anatomical methods in mice to assess OD plasticity at the systems level and to understand cellular and molecular mechanisms of PirB function. Together, experiments should elucidate how PirB normally acts in neurons to suppress synaptic-plasticity signaling pathways during and beyond the critical period, as well as test feasibility of restoring OD plasticity by acute PirB blockade. They represent key steps in understanding mechanisms of developmental critical periods, as well as for designing new ways to enhance CNS function and repair by engaging the brain's inherent capacity for neural plasticity.

Public Health Relevance

The idea that extensive synaptic plasticity might be restored to the brain by releasing the brake on mechanisms that act endogenously to suppress plasticity and circuit change has important clinical implications. If brain circuits can be restore to a more immature state in which synaptic plasticity can be easily engaged, it might be possible to facilitate recovery following damage or memory loss associated with Stroke, Alzheimer's or other neurodegenerative disorders of aging. Retraining the brain might also be applied post hoc for childhood learning disabilities including Dyslexia or Amblyopia in the developing visual system, and possibly even for treatment of Autism.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Research Project (R01)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (SPC)
Program Officer
Steinmetz, Michael A
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Stanford University
Schools of Arts and Sciences
United States
Zip Code
Nguyen-Vu, Td Barbara; Zhao, Grace Q; Lahiri, Subhaneil et al. (2017) A saturation hypothesis to explain both enhanced and impaired learning with enhanced plasticity. Elife 6:
Vidal, George S; Djurisic, Maja; Brown, Kiana et al. (2016) Cell-Autonomous Regulation of Dendritic Spine Density by PirB. eNeuro 3:
Adelson, Jaimie D; Sapp, Richard W; Brott, Barbara K et al. (2016) Developmental Sculpting of Intracortical Circuits by MHC Class I H2-Db and H2-Kb. Cereb Cortex 26:1453-1463
Lee, Hanmi; Brott, Barbara K; Kirkby, Lowry A et al. (2014) Synapse elimination and learning rules co-regulated by MHC class I H2-Db. Nature 509:195-200
Bochner, David N; Sapp, Richard W; Adelson, Jaimie D et al. (2014) Blocking PirB up-regulates spines and functional synapses to unlock visual cortical plasticity and facilitate recovery from amblyopia. Sci Transl Med 6:258ra140
Djurisic, Maja; Vidal, George S; Mann, Miriam et al. (2013) PirB regulates a structural substrate for cortical plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:20771-6
Kim, Taeho; Vidal, George S; Djurisic, Maja et al. (2013) Human LilrB2 is a ?-amyloid receptor and its murine homolog PirB regulates synaptic plasticity in an Alzheimer's model. Science 341:1399-404
Adelson, Jaimie D; Barreto, George E; Xu, Lijun et al. (2012) Neuroprotection from stroke in the absence of MHCI or PirB. Neuron 73:1100-7
William, Christopher M; Andermann, Mark L; Goldey, Glenn J et al. (2012) Synaptic plasticity defect following visual deprivation in Alzheimer's disease model transgenic mice. J Neurosci 32:8004-11
Shatz, Carla J (2009) MHC class I: an unexpected role in neuronal plasticity. Neuron 64:40-5

Showing the most recent 10 out of 73 publications