The related yeast transcriptional activators SWI5 and ACE2 have related zinc finger/DNA-binding domains, and bind to the same sequence. Yet SWI5 activates HO (endonuclease for mating type switching) and ACE2 activates CTS1 (chitinase). Both activators work in G1 of the cell cycle. What is the basis of their specificity? In the prior period, Dr. Stillman has made several findings. First, binding sites for ACE2 in the CTS1 promoter were identified and binding of ACE2 and SWI5 to CTS1 and HO sites compared in vitro. This led to the conclusion that SWI5 and ACE2 bind to the same sequences with the same affinities. Interestingly, a third gene SIC1 (cdk inhibitor) was identified which is activated by both SWI5 and ACE2. Second, SWI5 binds to the HO UAS in concert with another activator, PHO2, in vitro. In vivo, PHO2 is not required for transcription of wild type HO, but is important when the SWI- binding sites in HO have been weakened by mutation. PHO2 works in concert with different yeast activators for genes such as PHO5 and HIS4. It plays no role in expression of CTS1 and does not cooperate with ACE2. Third, by making SWI5-ACE2 chimeras, large regions in these proteins were identified which are distinct from the DNA-binding domains and dictate target gene specificity. Fourth, a negative element in the CTS1 promoter was roughly defined which when removed allows SWI5 to activate. It is suggested that one activity of ACE2 must be to counteract this element. This element also will inhibit the heterologous CYC1 activators in promoter fusions. Possible trans-acting repressors for this element were identified by mutations in genes (NCE) that allow SWI5 to activate CTS1. Fifth. regions in both PHO2 and SWI5 required for cooperation at HO were identified. The PHO2 mutations were deletions and the SWI5 mutations included single amino acid changes, which clustered in one region. Sixth, mutations in the two distant SWI5 binding sites of HO were used to expose a PHO2 requirement, leading to a picture that a SWI5-PHO2 complex mediates the long range interactions between these two sites. In the next period, the PI proposes to 1. further characterize the PHO2-SWI5 interaction. 2. Characterize the negative regulation in the CTS1 promoter. 3. Characterize the role of negative regulation in HO promoter specificity. 4. Characterize how ACE2 confers promoter specific activation. 5. Characterize the regulation of other genes regulated by SWI5 and ACE2.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM048624-08
Application #
6180103
Study Section
Molecular Biology Study Section (MBY)
Program Officer
Tompkins, Laurie
Project Start
1993-08-01
Project End
2002-03-31
Budget Start
2000-08-01
Budget End
2002-03-31
Support Year
8
Fiscal Year
2000
Total Cost
$222,807
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Utah
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
City
Salt Lake City
State
UT
Country
United States
Zip Code
84112
Stillman, David J (2010) Nhp6: a small but powerful effector of chromatin structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1799:175-80
Pondugula, Santhi; Neef, Daniel W; Voth, Warren P et al. (2009) Coupling phosphate homeostasis to cell cycle-specific transcription: mitotic activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 by Mcm1 and Forkhead proteins. Mol Cell Biol 29:4891-905
Reid, Robert J D; Sunjevaric, Ivana; Voth, Warren P et al. (2008) Chromosome-scale genetic mapping using a set of 16 conditionally stable Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes. Genetics 180:1799-808
Laabs, Tracy L; Markwardt, David D; Slattery, Matthew G et al. (2003) ACE2 is required for daughter cell-specific G1 delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:10275-80
Bhoite, Leena T; Allen, Jason M; Garcia, Emily et al. (2002) Mutations in the pho2 (bas2) transcription factor that differentially affect activation with its partner proteins bas1, pho4, and swi5. J Biol Chem 277:37612-8
Hannum, Charles; Kulaeva, Olga I; Sun, Helen et al. (2002) Functional mapping of Bas2. Identification of activation and Bas1-interaction domains. J Biol Chem 277:34003-9
Gerald, N J; Damer, C K; O'Halloran, T J et al. (2001) Cytokinesis failure in clathrin-minus cells is caused by cleavage furrow instability. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 48:213-23
Wessels, D; Reynolds, J; Johnson, O et al. (2000) Clathrin plays a novel role in the regulation of cell polarity, pseudopod formation, uropod stability and motility in Dictyostelium. J Cell Sci 113 ( Pt 1):21-36
Meimoun, A; Holtzman, T; Weissman, Z et al. (2000) Degradation of the transcription factor Gcn4 requires the kinase Pho85 and the SCF(CDC4) ubiquitin-ligase complex. Mol Biol Cell 11:915-27
Damer, C K; O'Halloran, T J (2000) Spatially regulated recruitment of clathrin to the plasma membrane during capping and cell translocation. Mol Biol Cell 11:2151-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 17 publications