Most human genes are regulated after they are transcribed, at the level of splicing, mRNA decay, translation, and/or mRNA localization. The specificity of post-transcriptional regulation is driven mostly by the sequence- or structure-specific recognition of RNA by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). We described an integrated series of efforts organized around a single but broad-reaching aim: SA1. To understand the extent, nature and evolutionary conservation of sequence context effects on RBP binding to RNA motifs. We have recently developed an assay called RNA Bind-n-Seq (RBNS) for comprehensive, quantitative analysis of an RBP?s affinity for RNA. Here, we propose to extend this approach to study the determinants of binding to natural human and mouse 3' UTR sequence by several important RBPs.
Sub aims are directed at understanding how RNA secondary structure impacts RBP binding to cognate motifs, understanding the effects of flanking sequence composition, assessing the conservation of RBP affinity to specific RNA regions, and developing and testing a predictive model of RBP/RNA interaction. The project is expected to yield a deeper understanding of how the sequence and structural context of an RNA motif influence its occupancy and regulatory potential, and insights into the functions of RBPs such as FMRP, hnRNP K, MBNL1 and RBFOX1 that play important roles in development and in diseases such as mental retardation, myotonic dystrophy, autism and cancer.
This project will provide comprehensive resources, tools and concepts for understanding the binding of proteins to RNA. It will also generate comprehensive binding affinity data for several important RNA binding proteins, including factors that play central roles in myotonic dystrophy and fragile X syndrome, and other factors that are implicated in autism and cancer, information which may aid in design of therapies.
|Dominguez, Daniel; Freese, Peter; Alexis, Maria S et al. (2018) Sequence, Structure, and Context Preferences of Human RNA Binding Proteins. Mol Cell 70:854-867.e9|
|Pai, Athma A; Paggi, Joseph M; Yan, Paul et al. (2018) Numerous recursive sites contribute to accuracy of splicing in long introns in flies. PLoS Genet 14:e1007588|
|Pai, Athma A; Henriques, Telmo; McCue, Kayla et al. (2017) The kinetics of pre-mRNA splicing in the Drosophila genome and the influence of gene architecture. Elife 6:|
|Taliaferro, J Matthew; Lambert, Nicole J; Sudmant, Peter H et al. (2016) RNA Sequence Context Effects Measured In Vitro Predict In Vivo Protein Binding and Regulation. Mol Cell 64:294-306|
|Taliaferro, J Matthew; Vidaki, Marina; Oliveira, Ruan et al. (2016) Distal Alternative Last Exons Localize mRNAs to Neural Projections. Mol Cell 61:821-33|
|Katz, Yarden; Wang, Eric T; Silterra, Jacob et al. (2015) Quantitative visualization of alternative exon expression from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 31:2400-2|
|Lambert, Nicole J; Robertson, Alex D; Burge, Christopher B (2015) RNA Bind-n-Seq: Measuring the Binding Affinity Landscape of RNA-Binding Proteins. Methods Enzymol 558:465-493|
|Wang, Eric T; Ward, Amanda J; Cherone, Jennifer M et al. (2015) Antagonistic regulation of mRNA expression and splicing by CELF and MBNL proteins. Genome Res 25:858-71|
|Katz, Yarden; Li, Feifei; Lambert, Nicole J et al. (2014) Musashi proteins are post-transcriptional regulators of the epithelial-luminal cell state. Elife 3:e03915|
|Lambert, Nicole; Robertson, Alex; Jangi, Mohini et al. (2014) RNA Bind-n-Seq: quantitative assessment of the sequence and structural binding specificity of RNA binding proteins. Mol Cell 54:887-900|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 21 publications