Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. It emanates from narrowing of coronary arteries (CAD) and/or development of microvascular dysfunction culminating in myocardial ischemia ? a condition where the oxygen demand of the myocardium is far in excess of the available supply. IHD accounts for more than 1 in 3 deaths and >1 million hospitalizations each year in the US. The extent and severity of myocardial ischemia has been shown to provide incremental prognostic value over standard clinical variables across the spectrum of presentation of patients with IHD. Long-established (SPECT or PET) and more recently established (e.g., first pass-perfusion MRI) methods are routinely used to gather this information. In spite of their capabilities, these methods have key limitations ? they expose the patients to either ionizing radiation or exogenous contrast agents, which carry risks to the patients. This is particularly a critical problem in at least half a million patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the US. In ESRD patients, annual ischemia testing is needed since the risk of cardiovascular mortality is > 10-fold greater than in the general population. Hence there is an unmet and growing need for safe and reliable assessment of myocardial ischemia in all patients, and is most pressing in ESRD patients, whose prevalence in the US is on the rise. Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent (BOLD) Cardiac MRI (CMR) is a potential alternative to standard clinical methods since it is free of ionizing radiation and exogenous contrast media. It also has the capability to provide physiological insight into the disease based on measurements of impaired oxygen supply, and not from surrogate metrics (wall motion, ECG changes, or contrast kinetics). Over the past two decades, the technical capabilities of BOLD CMR have led to clinical testing. However, limitations in reliability (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) remain a major impediment for widespread clinical use of BOLD CMR. To overcome the reliability limitations of BOLD CMR, in a previous R01 funding (2013 to 2017), we hypothesized that repeat stimulations of the heart, analogous to brain activation studies using BOLD MRI (brain fMRI), could improve the reliability of BOLD CMR. Subsequently, we went onto demonstrate that (i) a targeted change in arterial partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) can be a potent non-invasive vasoactive stimulus; and a (ii) high-resolution, whole heart BOLD CMR at 3T with repeat PaCO2 stimulation of the heart, when combined with a statistical framework, can reliably detect BOLD signal changes in large, healthy, animals. To successfully translate the promising impact of this BOLD CMR approach into the clinical arena, further advances and validation will be required. This proposal aims to continue the successful advancement of this BOLD CMR approach towards clinical feasibility so that it can enable a truly noninvasive and cost-effective ischemia testing that is free of ionizing radiation, exogenous contrast agents, intravenous pharmacological agents or even needles. Thus, this proposal is a critical step towards advancing the care of a large segment of IHD patients in the US.
Cardiac stress tests are crucial for managing ischemic heart disease (IHD), which affects >16 million Americans, but current stress tests expose patients suspected of IHD to ionizing radiation or exogenous contrast agents. The potential risk from stress tests are most pressing in the management of end-stage renal disease patients (>0.5 million in the US), who require annual stress testing as they are at high risk of developing and dying from IHD. This proposal aims to address this limitation by developing a clinically viable cardiac MRI approach which could enable a truly noninvasive and cost effective ischemia testing that is free of ionizing radiation, exogenous contrast agents, intravenous pharmacological agents or even needles.
