Experiencing a familiar concept implicitly activates related concepts. This activation processes. However, as the project has shown, such activation also affect memory for direct experience. The goal of this research is to understand how implicitly activated concepts affect the encoding and retrieval of direct experience and to develop a theoretical model that explains this influence. The working model assumes that the encoding of related concepts incorporates them into the learning or testing episode, and that such 'Incorporation can either facilitate of hinder depending on the tasks that must be performed. The model specifies when related concepts are likely to be encoded and how they affect performance. The methodology requires subjects to encode familiar concepts under various learning conditions and to retrieve these concepts under various testing conditions. Variations in learning conditions include manipulations of context, encoding orientation, timing and interference; variations in testing conditions include manipulations of type of retention test, the nature of the retrieval cues and location of testing. All experiments involve manipulations of the number of related concepts activated by directly experienced concepts. In general, concepts that activate larger networks of related concepts are not as likely to be remembered, nor are they as likely to be effective as retrieval cues. These findings hold for both phonemically and meaning- fully related concepts. Implicitly activated concepts can interfere with memory for what was actually experienced. However, there are exceptions to these general patterns, even reversals of effect, and they help explain how implicitly activated concepts affect behavior. Findings will be relevant to understanding memory in normals, and will have direct implications for research in perception, learning, speech, reading, language comprehension, and for practitioners in mental health who rely on cues to help clients retrieve information.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH016360-22
Application #
3374701
Study Section
Psychobiology and Behavior Review Committee (PYB)
Project Start
1976-12-01
Project End
1994-08-31
Budget Start
1991-09-15
Budget End
1992-08-31
Support Year
22
Fiscal Year
1991
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of South Florida
Department
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
City
Tampa
State
FL
Country
United States
Zip Code
33612
Nelson, Douglas L; Goodmon, Leilani B; Akirmak, Umit (2007) Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues. Mem Cognit 35:1878-91
Nelson, Douglas L; Fisher, Serena L; Akirmak, Umit (2007) How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues. Mem Cognit 35:1892-904
Nelson, Douglas L; Goodmon, Leilani B; Ceo, David (2007) How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context? Mem Cognit 35:1014-23
Fisher, Serena L; Nelson, Douglas L (2006) Recursive reminding: effects of repetition, printed frequency, connectivity, and set size on recognition and judgments of frequency. Mem Cognit 34:295-306
Nelson, Douglas L; Dyrdal, Gunvor M; Goodmon, Leilani B (2005) What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities. Psychon Bull Rev 12:711-9
Nelson, Douglas L; McEvoy, Cathy L; Schreiber, Thomas A (2004) The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:402-7
Goodmon, Leilani B; Nelson, Douglas L (2004) Strengthening the activation of unconsciously activated memories. Mem Cognit 32:804-18
Nelson, Douglas L; McEvoy, Cathy L; Pointer, Lisa (2003) Spreading activation or spooky action at a distance? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:42-52
Nelson, Douglas L; McKinney, Vanesa M; McEvoy, Cathy L (2003) Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated? Psychon Bull Rev 10:118-24
Nelson, Douglas L; Goodmon, Leilani B (2003) Disrupting attention: the need for retrieval cues in working memory theories. Mem Cognit 31:65-76

Showing the most recent 10 out of 39 publications