This first aim of this competing application will be to continue to elucidate the molecular basis of ligand recognition by DA (especially the D1-like) receptors, and the functional consequences of such interactions. We shall continue to utilize several strategies of ligand-based molecular modeling (including traditional and novel Comparative Molecular Field Analysis [CoMFA] techniques) to refine existing models, and test the hypothesis of alternate binding models for these receptors. This will be complemented by structure-based receptor modeling and drug design. Site-directed receptor mutagenesis, coupled with the synthesis and use of novel rigid ligands that can probe the mutated space of the receptor, are hypothesized to provide definitive structural information about several key aspects of receptor topography. This in turn can then be used to test and refine models of the D1-like receptors. In an iterative fashion, we shall continue to develop new ligands with novel mechanisms of receptor binding or activation, and with selectivity for D1 versus D5 receptors. These ligands will be powerful tools for continued research on receptor structure and function. The second major direction of this work is to understand the consequence of drug-receptor interaction. Although our past work has provided the first full D1 agonists and an understanding of the molecular characteristics of drugs that affect their intrinsic efficacy, it is unclear what molecular mechanisms engender full versus partial agonism. We shall determine the role of activation of various isoforms of G-proteins and transduction systems to determine if partial agonism is quantal or graded in terms of activation of: (1) individual populations of G-proteins; and 2) various transduction systems (especially adenylate cyclases). Finally, we shall study the molecular mechanisms involved in desensitization and down-regulation. Despite extensive understanding of these phenomena in other G-protein systems, our work has shown that drugs of apparently similar characteristics (e.g., high affinity full D1 agonists) can cause markedly different changes over time, in both in vitro cellular systems and the intact brain. Using site directed mutagenesis, a series of in vitro and in vivo system, and a powerful armamentarium of pharmacological probes, we shall seek to determine what aspects of receptor structure are important for regulatory events. In addition, we shall determine how co-activation of one or more populations of DA D2-like receptors affects long-term adaptive changes in vivo. These studies will not only be useful for heuristic reasons, but may affect the pending use of D1 agonists in several clinical conditions.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
2R01MH040537-13
Application #
2631087
Study Section
Neuropharmacology and Neurochemistry Review Committee (NPNC)
Project Start
1985-04-01
Project End
2002-01-31
Budget Start
1998-04-01
Budget End
1999-01-31
Support Year
13
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Department
Other Basic Sciences
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
078861598
City
Chapel Hill
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27599
Arnsten, Amy F T; Girgis, Ragy R; Gray, David L et al. (2017) Novel Dopamine Therapeutics for Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 81:67-77
Lee, Sang-Min; Yang, Yang; Mailman, Richard B (2014) Dopamine D1 receptor signaling: does G?Q-phospholipase C actually play a role? J Pharmacol Exp Ther 351:9-17
Lee, Sang-Min; Kant, Andrew; Blake, Daniel et al. (2014) SKF-83959 is not a highly-biased functionally selective D1 dopamine receptor ligand with activity at phospholipase C. Neuropharmacology 86:145-54
Boyd, Kevin N; Mailman, Richard B (2012) Dopamine receptor signaling and current and future antipsychotic drugs. Handb Exp Pharmacol :53-86
Fowler, J Corey; Bhattacharya, Supriyo; Urban, Jonathan D et al. (2012) Receptor conformations involved in dopamine D(2L) receptor functional selectivity induced by selected transmembrane-5 serine mutations. Mol Pharmacol 81:820-31
Mailman, Richard B; Murthy, Vishakantha (2010) Ligand functional selectivity advances our understanding of drug mechanisms and drug discovery. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:345-6
Mailman, Richard B; Murthy, Vishakantha (2010) Third generation antipsychotic drugs: partial agonism or receptor functional selectivity? Curr Pharm Des 16:488-501
Brown, Justin T; Kant, Andrew; Mailman, Richard B (2009) Rapid, semi-automated, and inexpensive radioimmunoassay of cAMP: application in GPCR-mediated adenylate cyclase assays. J Neurosci Methods 177:261-6
Mailman, Richard B (2007) GPCR functional selectivity has therapeutic impact. Trends Pharmacol Sci 28:390-6
Ryman-Rasmussen, Jessica P; Griffith, Adam; Oloff, Scott et al. (2007) Functional selectivity of dopamine D1 receptor agonists in regulating the fate of internalized receptors. Neuropharmacology 52:562-75

Showing the most recent 10 out of 80 publications