One important characteristic of the normal human cognitive system is its ability to monitor its own behavior. When a particular task must be accomplished, links among components of the cognitive system are established and the dynamics of the system are adjusted so as to satisfy the goals of the task. The performance of the system is then evaluated within the framework of these goals. In this context, monitoring involves a comparison between actual performance and some desired performance, with performance being defined in terms of the speed and/or accuracy of a response. A related aspect of the cognitive system is its ability to initiate remedial action when the monitoring system detects a discrepancy between actual and desired performance (i.e., an error). Possible actions include immediate attempts to inhibit or correct the error, or longer term (re)-adjustments that will reduce the likelihood of future errors. The proposed research will focus on this ability of the human cognitive system to monitor its own behavior and to initiate remedial action of the behavior does not conform to task goals. The research will utilize the psychophysiological approach in which the traditional measures of mental chronometry (speed and accuracy) are augmented by measures of psychophysiological function (e.g., scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials and the electaromyogram). Particular emphasis will be given to measures of a component of the event-related potential (the error-related negativity or ERN) that is specifically related to error-processing. The ERN can be detected by analyzing electrical brain activity that is time- locked to the execution of an incorrect response. The research will elucidate the error-related processes that are implemented by the neural system that underlies the ERN, and will use this information to elaborate on error-detection and related mechanisms. In particular, the research will evaluate the generality of the error-detection process, the nature of the representations used by the error-detection process, the automaticity of error-related processes, and the degree to which connectionist models of error processing can approximate actual data. The research is important because it deals with an aspect of human cognitive function that is dysfunctional in some psychiatric and neurological disorders, but that has been neglected in most prior research.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH041445-13
Application #
2674859
Study Section
Perception and Cognition Review Committee (PEC)
Project Start
1986-05-01
Project End
2001-07-31
Budget Start
1998-08-01
Budget End
2001-07-31
Support Year
13
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
041544081
City
Champaign
State
IL
Country
United States
Zip Code
61820
Holroyd, Clay B; Coles, Michael G H (2008) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex integrates reinforcement history to guide voluntary behavior. Cortex 44:548-59
Holroyd, Clay B; Yeung, Nick; Coles, Michael G H et al. (2005) A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:163-91
Miltner, Wolfgang H R; Lemke, Ulrike; Weiss, Thomas et al. (2003) Implementation of error-processing in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a source analysis of the magnetic equivalent of the error-related negativity. Biol Psychol 64:157-66
Holroyd, Clay B; Coles, Michael G H (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 109:679-709
Coles, M G; Scheffers, M K; Holroyd, C B (2001) Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing. Biol Psychol 56:173-89
Scheffers, M K; Coles, M G (2000) Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:141-51
Fournier, L R; Scheffers, M K; Coles, M G et al. (2000) When complexity helps: an electrophysiological analysis of multiple feature benefits in object perception. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104:119-42
Scheffers, M K; Humphrey, D G; Stanny, R R et al. (1999) Error-related processing during a period of extended wakefulness. Psychophysiology 36:149-57
Spencer, K M; Coles, M G (1999) The lateralized readiness potential: relationship between human data and response activation in a connectionist model. Psychophysiology 36:364-70
Holroyd, C B; Dien, J; Coles, M G (1998) Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans. Neurosci Lett 242:65-8

Showing the most recent 10 out of 33 publications