This is one-half of a two-site study proposed jointly by Foa and Franklin at the University of Pennsylvania, and Liebowitz and Simpson at Columbia University, who are submitting separate but similar proposals (collaborative CSMD). Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is prevalent, chronic, and debilitating. Both cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) by exposure and ritual prevention (EX/RP) and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are recommended for OCD. However, recommended doses of the widely used SRIs leave many patients with substantial residual symptoms and a need for more help. This proposal addresses an important problem in treating OCD: how to augment the limited efficacy of SRIs. This study will examine the immediate and long-term value of adding an established CBT for OCD, i.e., EX/RP, to continuing SRI treatment, for reducing residual symptoms and increasing general functioning. Participants will be 136 individuals (68/site) with clinically significant OCD despite having benefited somewhat from an adequate trial of a SRI. While continuing on an SRI, patients will be randomized to adjunctive EX/RP or another CBT, Stress Management Training (SMT). SMT targets generalized anxiety symptoms, but has not been found effective for OCD. As a credible comparison therapy, SMT will control for time, attention, and other non-specific effects of CBT. Both adjunctive CBT treatments will occur twice a week for 2 months. Responders will enter a 6 month Maintenance Phase, during which they will continue their medication and receive monthly 45 min. maintenance sessions. Those who remain in remission will then enter a 6 month Follow-up Phase, in which they will be allowed to reduce or discontinue medication, and will have no further CBT. Non-responders and relapsers will be treated appropriately and evaluated every 3 months. Assessments will focus on OCD symptoms and on general functioning; they will occur during an Acute Phase (0, 1, 2 mos) and every 3 months thereafter (5, 8, 11, 14 months). The proposed sample will allow sufficient power to test both treatment and site effects. This study has several unique features. 1. It offers a model for pharmacotherapy-psychotherapy studies because experts in each modality will deliver both treatments; this guards against expert biases for either treatment. 2. We wanted the results to be directly applicable to OCD patients seen in routine clinical practice. Accordingly, exclusion criteria are few. 3. The EX/RP protocol was designed to maintain efficacy while maximizing practicality. 4. Patients who are unable to remain in the treatment protocol for any reason will continue to be assessed; this will allow us to describe the long-term outcome of the whole sample. Long-term goals are: a) to provide clinicians with new strategies for treating OCD patients who remain symptomatic despite an adequate trial of a SRI and b) to establish effective treatments that reduces the considerable social costs of unremittant OCD.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH045404-12
Application #
6538617
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMH1-ITV-D (01))
Program Officer
Niederehe, George T
Project Start
1990-09-01
Project End
2005-06-30
Budget Start
2002-07-01
Budget End
2003-06-30
Support Year
12
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
$356,625
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Psychiatry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Strauss, Asher Y; Huppert, Jonathan D; Simpson, H Blair et al. (2018) What matters more? Common or specific factors in cognitive behavioral therapy for OCD: Therapeutic alliance and expectations as predictors of treatment outcome. Behav Res Ther 105:43-51
Asnaani, Anu; Kaczkurkin, Antonia N; Alpert, Elizabeth et al. (2017) The effect of treatment on quality of life and functioning in OCD. Compr Psychiatry 73:7-14
Su, Yi-Jen; Carpenter, Joseph K; Zandberg, Laurie J et al. (2016) Cognitive Mediation of Symptom Change in Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Behav Ther 47:474-86
Wheaton, Michael G; Carpenter, Joseph K; Kalanthroff, Eyal et al. (2016) Augmenting SRIs for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Patient Preference for Risperidone Does Not Limit Effectiveness of Exposure and Ritual Prevention. Psychother Psychosom 85:314-6
Wheaton, Michael G; Galfalvy, Hanga; Steinman, Shari A et al. (2016) Patient adherence and treatment outcome with exposure and response prevention for OCD: Which components of adherence matter and who becomes well? Behav Res Ther 85:6-12
Foa, Edna B; Simpson, Helen Blair; Rosenfield, David et al. (2015) Six-month outcomes from a randomized trial augmenting serotonin reuptake inhibitors with exposure and response prevention or risperidone in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 76:440-6
McLean, Carmen P; Zandberg, Laurie J; Van Meter, Page E et al. (2015) Exposure and response prevention helps adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder who do not respond to pharmacological augmentation strategies. J Clin Psychiatry 76:1653-7
Wheaton, Michael G; Rosenfield, David; Foa, Edna B et al. (2015) Augmenting serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder: What moderates improvement? J Consult Clin Psychol 83:926-937
Zandberg, Laurie J; Zang, Yinyin; McLean, Carmen P et al. (2015) Change in obsessive-compulsive symptoms mediates subsequent change in depressive symptoms during exposure and response prevention. Behav Res Ther 68:76-81
Williams, Monnica T; Farris, Samantha G; Turkheimer, Eric N et al. (2014) The impact of symptom dimensions on outcome for exposure and ritual prevention therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord 28:553-8

Showing the most recent 10 out of 40 publications