This proposal is an amended competing renewal application to extend our currently funded project, R01 MH056888, Interpersonal Functioning and Emotion in Borderline Personality. Based on our prior results, we continue to regard attachment theory as the best framework for understanding interpersonal functioning in borderline personality disorder (BPD) In BPD, anxious, ambivalent attachment takes a distinctive form- frequent disappointments and anger toward others lead to periods of hostile withdrawal, followed by loneliness and fears regarding separation, producing new attempts at approach and reconciliation, which continue until the next episode of frustration and disappointment. The key themes in this self-defeating cycle are (a) struggles with anger and (b) an inability to maintain a consistent and comfortable interpersonal distance from others. We propose to examine these processes from a dyadic perspective-an innovative, new step for research on personality disorders. We will assess these processes from the perspectives of both the patient and a romantic partner, given our earlier findings that romance is a high-risk domain for patients with BPD, consistent with our assumption about the central role of attachment mechanisms. The major objective is to enhance our understanding of these central mechanisms in BPD by assessing these phenomena at multiple levels of analysis. We will use three methods (at different levels of granularity and with different time scales) to achieve this objective. First, we will conduct a dyadic laboratory interaction involving a discussion of a currently troublesome and unresolved issue in the relationship. The interaction will be coded for both affect and behavior using the Specific Affect Coding System (SPAFF), and measures of peripheral psychophysiology will be recorded. Second, we will use a dyadic, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol completed simultaneously by participant and partner for three weeks. Finally, we will include a social network analysis of the 25 most emotionally significant figures for the participant (and partner) during the past year. Our first specific aim s to document that patients with BPD (n = 55 dyads) have higher mean levels of anger, greater variability in anger, and a stronger association between threats to attachment and anger compared to patients with other PDs (OPD, n = 55 dyads) or no PD (n = 55 dyads). Our second specific aim is to document that patients with BPD display greater variability in interpersonal distance compared to patients with other PDs or no PD. Our third specific aim is to document that these effects regarding anger and interpersonal distance are moderated by the characteristics and behavior of partners, especially their own attachment anxiety. The work will be done with a total sample of 165 dyads consisting of men and women between the ages of 18 and 40. We believe that incorporating dyadic assessment (together with continued attention to the broader social networks in which both partners are embedded) is the best way forward to improved, evidence-based treatments that can address interpersonal functioning at the level of day-to-day transactions.
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe and debilitating psychiatric disorder. Current treatments focus primarily on the individual patient, bu we believe that a broader interpersonal context (exemplified by dyadic assessment and the inclusion of romantic partners) can identify new targets for intervention and provide more therapeutic impact. The inclusion of a partner will allow us to build a base of evidence that opens the door to enhanced treatment interventions for couples in which one or both members suffer from BPD.
|Beeney, Joseph E; Lazarus, Sophie A; Hallquist, Michael N et al. (2018) Detecting the Presence of a Personality Disorder Using Interpersonal and Self-Dysfunction. J Pers Disord :1-20|
|Aslinger, Elizabeth N; Manuck, Stephen B; Pilkonis, Paul A et al. (2018) Narcissist or narcissistic? Evaluation of the latent structure of narcissistic personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 127:496-502|
|Lazarus, Sophie A; Scott, Lori N; Beeney, Joseph E et al. (2018) Borderline personality disorder symptoms and affective responding to perceptions of rejection and acceptance from romantic versus nonromantic partners. Personal Disord 9:197-206|
|Beeney, Joseph E; Hallquist, Michael N; Clifton, Allan D et al. (2018) Social disadvantage and borderline personality disorder: A study of social networks. Personal Disord 9:62-72|
|Scott, Lori N; Wright, Aidan G C; Beeney, Joseph E et al. (2017) Borderline personality disorder symptoms and aggression: A within-person process model. J Abnorm Psychol 126:429-440|
|Girard, Jeffrey M; Wright, Aidan G C; Beeney, Joseph E et al. (2017) Interpersonal problems across levels of the psychopathology hierarchy. Compr Psychiatry 79:53-69|
|Ross, Jaclyn M; Girard, Jeffrey M; Wright, Aidan G C et al. (2017) Momentary patterns of covariation between specific affects and interpersonal behavior: Linking relationship science and personality assessment. Psychol Assess 29:123-134|
|Wright, Aidan G C; Stepp, Stephanie D; Scott, Lori N et al. (2017) The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. J Abnorm Psychol 126:898-910|
|Wright, Aidan G C; Hallquist, Michael N; Stepp, Stephanie D et al. (2016) Modeling Heterogeneity in Momentary Interpersonal and Affective Dynamic Processes in Borderline Personality Disorder. Assessment 23:484-495|
|Beeney, Joseph E; Stepp, Stephanie D; Hallquist, Michael N et al. (2015) Attachment and social cognition in borderline personality disorder: Specificity in relation to antisocial and avoidant personality disorders. Personal Disord 6:207-15|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 48 publications