Memory is a critical component of human cognition, and has major implications for everyday life and mental health. The long-term goals of this project are to increase our understanding of critical encoding and retrieval processes, and to help explain why memory is sometimes inaccurate, by using recently developed event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques. The first 2 specific aims focus on basic aspects of encoding and retrieval, whereas the next 3 focus on memory distortion. The first specific aim is to characterize the functional anatomy of encoding, and test hypotheses concerning the involvement of specific brain regions in encoding variability, repetition priming, and response learning effects. Experiments 1-2 examine encoding manipulations that improve or impair subsequent memory, using techniques that link brain activity during encoding with later memory performance. The 2nd specific aim is to test hypotheses concerning the role of prefrontal cortex in specific aspects of strategic retrieval, which we do in Experiments 3 and 4 by manipulating the usefulness of recollective retrieval strategies. The 3rd specific aim is to characterize the neural underpinnings of true and false memory by testing the hypotheses that true memory, more than false memory, involves reactivation of sensory cortices involved in perceptual encoding, and that sensory reactivation reflects the influence of priming, a form of implicit memory. Experiments 5-10 accomplish this objective by comparing true and false memories, and conscious versus nonconscious recognition, for visual shapes, patterns, and objects. The 4th specific aim is to characterize encoding processes that result in memory errors in which people falsely recognize similar objects as the same ones they previously studied. Experiments 11-12 accomplish these objectives by using experimental procedures that relate particular encoding events to later true and false recognition. The 5th specific aim is to link work on memory distortion with research concerning perception of objects and scenes. Experiments 13 and 14 evaluate hypotheses regarding the role played by regions of parahippocampal cortex involved in contextual associations in false recognition of objects, and Experiment 15 examines the role of this region in boundary extension, where people """"""""remember"""""""" aspects of a scene that were not presented in a photograph but are likely to have been present just beyond its borders. The proposed studies will increase our understanding of how memories are constructed, and will also contribute to efforts to improve memory.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH060941-07
Application #
7215247
Study Section
Cognition and Perception Study Section (CP)
Program Officer
Osborn, Bettina D
Project Start
2000-03-15
Project End
2010-03-31
Budget Start
2007-04-01
Budget End
2008-03-31
Support Year
7
Fiscal Year
2007
Total Cost
$393,504
Indirect Cost
Name
Harvard University
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
082359691
City
Cambridge
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02138
Campbell, Karen L; Madore, Kevin P; Benoit, Roland G et al. (2018) Increased hippocampus to ventromedial prefrontal connectivity during the construction of episodic future events. Hippocampus 28:76-80
St Jacques, Peggy L; Carpenter, Alexis C; Szpunar, Karl K et al. (2018) Remembering and imagining alternative versions of the personal past. Neuropsychologia 110:170-179
Carpenter, Alexis C; Schacter, Daniel L (2018) False memories, false preferences: Flexible retrieval mechanisms supporting successful inference bias novel decisions. J Exp Psychol Gen 147:988-1004
Roberts, Reece P; Schacter, Daniel L; Addis, Donna Rose (2018) Scene Construction and Relational Processing: Separable Constructs? Cereb Cortex 28:1729-1732
Beaty, Roger E; Thakral, Preston P; Madore, Kevin P et al. (2018) Core Network Contributions to Remembering the Past, Imagining the Future, and Thinking Creatively. J Cogn Neurosci :1-13
Madore, Kevin P; Jing, Helen G; Schacter, Daniel L (2018) Selective effects of specificity inductions on episodic details: evidence for an event construction account. Memory :1-11
Beaty, Roger E; Chen, Qunlin; Christensen, Alexander P et al. (2018) Brain networks of the imaginative mind: Dynamic functional connectivity of default and cognitive control networks relates to openness to experience. Hum Brain Mapp 39:811-821
Schacter, Daniel L (2018) Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci :1745691618803640
Spreng, R Nathan; Madore, Kevin P; Schacter, Daniel L (2018) Better imagined: Neural correlates of the episodic simulation boost to prospective memory performance. Neuropsychologia 113:22-28
Madore, Kevin P; Jing, Helen G; Schacter, Daniel L (2018) Episodic specificity induction and scene construction: Evidence for an event construction account. Conscious Cogn 68:1-11

Showing the most recent 10 out of 132 publications