The virologic markers that to date have been used as secondary endpoints in most of The ACTG protocols have been shown to be inadequate. Newer techniques that are more quantitative, faster, and less expensive are necessary. Most importantly, these new markers should change with disease progression or with effective drug therapy. More rapid assays for the determination of drug sensitivity are also needed immediately as increasing numbers of patients stay on medication for prolonged periods of time. All of these assays should correlate with the clinical data obtained from the patient. Previous work in this laboratory has indicated that virtually all of the infectious HIV found in cell-free plasma is in the form of immune complexes. Infectious immune complexes are easily and efficiently precipitated from plasma with polyethylene glycol. Procedures taking advantage of these features will be developed that will: (1) improve the p24 antigen assay and make it more clinically relevant and (2) streamline drug sensitivity testing by directly screening plasma for sensitive or resistant isolates. This assay will help the clinician determine the best drug to use for a particular patient in a more appropriate amount of time (1 to 2 weeks). In addition to the development of new virologic markers the laboratory will continue to provide the required virologic support of the ACTG by performing quantitative HIV cell and plasma cultures and p24 antigen assays. The lab will also continue to participate in the development of a consensus protocol for the isolation of drug resistant isolates from cells and the determination of their clinical relevance. The long term goal of the laboratory is to investigate the role of infectious immune complexes in the natural history and pathogenesis of HIV infection.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
10
Fiscal Year
1996
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Venuto, Charles S; Lim, Jihoon; Messing, Susan et al. (2018) Inflammation investigated as a source of pharmacokinetic variability of atazanavir in AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol A5224s. Antivir Ther 23:345-351
Bednasz, Cindy J; Venuto, Charles S; Ma, Qing et al. (2017) Efavirenz Therapeutic Range in HIV-1 Treatment-Naive Participants. Ther Drug Monit 39:596-603
Verma, Shefali S; Frase, Alex T; Verma, Anurag et al. (2016) PHENOME-WIDE INTERACTION STUDY (PheWIS) IN AIDS CLINICAL TRIALS GROUP DATA (ACTG). Pac Symp Biocomput 21:57-68
Moore, Carrie B; Verma, Anurag; Pendergrass, Sarah et al. (2015) Phenome-wide Association Study Relating Pretreatment Laboratory Parameters With Human Genetic Variants in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocols. Open Forum Infect Dis 2:ofu113
Lehmann, David S; Ribaudo, Heather J; Daar, Eric S et al. (2015) Genome-wide association study of virologic response with efavirenz-containing or abacavir-containing regimens in AIDS clinical trials group protocols. Pharmacogenet Genomics 25:51-9
Thio, Chloe L; Smeaton, Laura; Hollabaugh, Kimberly et al. (2015) Comparison of HBV-active HAART regimens in an HIV-HBV multinational cohort: outcomes through 144 weeks. AIDS 29:1173-82
Venuto, Charles S; Mollan, Katie; Ma, Qing et al. (2014) Sex differences in atazanavir pharmacokinetics and associations with time to clinical events: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5202. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:3300-10
Sacktor, Ned; Miyahara, Sachiko; Evans, Scott et al. (2014) Impact of minocycline on cerebrospinal fluid markers of oxidative stress, neuronal injury, and inflammation in HIV-seropositive individuals with cognitive impairment. J Neurovirol 20:620-6
Smith, Kimberly Y; Tierney, Camlin; Mollan, Katie et al. (2014) Outcomes by sex following treatment initiation with atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz with abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine. Clin Infect Dis 58:555-63
Kempen, John H; Sugar, Elizabeth A; Varma, Rohit et al. (2014) Risk of cataract among subjects with acquired immune deficiency syndrome free of ocular opportunistic infections. Ophthalmology 121:2317-24

Showing the most recent 10 out of 174 publications