This application describes the clinical and laboratory framework for conducting Phase I studies of new anticancer agents at Wayne State University. It is based on our understanding of the issues involved and, in part, predicated on the efforts of our Phase I program and the associated pharmacology laboratories in translational research and clinical development. Our program has focused on the early clinical development of solid tumor selective agents, incorporating into the trial design guidance provided by in vitro and in vivo efficacy and toxicology assays human drug metabolism, and preclinical pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. In addition to NCI/CTEP sponsored drugs (i.e. bryostatin, KRN5500,flavopiradol), our own efforts have contributed additional compounds for NCI-supported Phase I trials, including pyrazoloacridine (PZA; NSC 366140), acetyldinaline (CI-994)and WIN33377 (a thioxanthenone). Other compounds (i.e. XK469, second generation thioxanthenones) are awaiting Phase I clinical trial support. By way of example, this application describes development of PZA, CI994 and WIN33377, from initial preclinical identification through clinical investigation. In the case of PZA, our preclinical PK studies supported a successful PK-guided dose-escalation phase I trial and our in vitro assessment of human myelotoxicity confirmed that the targeted plasma AUC would be tolerated. With CI994, our translational studies helped define the clinical schedule and dose that resulted in maximal drug exposure. This application proposes to incorporate our laboratory expertise in pharmacokinetics, CYP 450 drug metabolism and hematotoxicology into efficient and rapid Phase I clinical trial designs. A process is described in detail with all the considerations necessary for the appropriate conduct of carefully controlled phase I studies to include: patient eligibility and rapid accrual of women and minority patients, philosophy of initial dose and dosage escalation, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and drug metabolism studies, the attaining of the maximally tolerated dose, reporting of adverse drug reactions, data management and quality control, biostatistical resources to include capabilities for the electronic transmittal of data and an evaluation of the impact of pharmacologic studies on the efficiency of the Phase I trial design. Thus, this proposal describes our understanding, expertise and specific ideas for the conduct of carefully controlled clinical and pharmacologic studies for the Phase I evaluation of new anticancer agents in a population that includes substantial numbers of women and minorities.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project--Cooperative Agreements (U01)
Project #
5U01CA062487-06
Application #
2871815
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-RLB-7 (O1))
Program Officer
Jensen, Leeann T
Project Start
1998-03-05
Project End
2003-01-31
Budget Start
1999-04-02
Budget End
2000-01-31
Support Year
6
Fiscal Year
1999
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Wayne State University
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
City
Detroit
State
MI
Country
United States
Zip Code
48202
Goncalves, Priscila H; Heilbrun, Lance K; Barrett, Michael T et al. (2017) A phase 2 study of vorinostat in locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oncotarget 8:32918-32929
Li, Jing; Kim, Seongho; Shields, Anthony F et al. (2016) Integrating Dynamic Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Pharmacokinetic Studies to Delineate Plasma and Tumor Pharmacokinetics of FAU, a Prodrug Bioactivated by Thymidylate Synthase. J Clin Pharmacol 56:1433-1447
LoRusso, Patricia M; Li, Jing; Burger, Angelika et al. (2016) Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 22:3227-37
Boerner, Julie L; Nechiporchik, Nicole; Mueller, Kelly L et al. (2015) Protein expression of DNA damage repair proteins dictates response to topoisomerase and PARP inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer. PLoS One 10:e0119614
Busaidy, Naifa L; LoRusso, Patricia; Lawhorn, Kristie et al. (2015) The Prevalence and Impact of Hyperglycemia and Hyperlipidemia in Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Combination Treatment With the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Temsirolimus and Insulin Growth Factor-Receptor Antibody Cixutumumab. Oncologist 20:737-41
Li, Jing; Kim, Seongho; Sha, Xianyi et al. (2014) Complex disease-, gene-, and drug-drug interactions: impacts of renal function, CYP2D6 phenotype, and OCT2 activity on veliparib pharmacokinetics. Clin Cancer Res 20:3931-44
Liu, Xiaochun; Lorusso, Patricia; Mita, Monica et al. (2014) Incidence of mucositis in patients treated with temsirolimus-based regimens and correlation to treatment response. Oncologist 19:426-8
Wu, Jianmei; Wiegand, Richard; LoRusso, Patricia et al. (2013) A stable isotope-labeled internal standard is essential for correcting for the interindividual variability in the recovery of lapatinib from cancer patient plasma in quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 941:100-8
Shibata, Stephen I; Chung, Vincent; Synold, Timothy W et al. (2013) Phase I study of pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumors and hepatic dysfunction: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group study. Clin Cancer Res 19:3631-9
Gojo, Ivana; Perl, Alexander; Luger, Selina et al. (2013) Phase I study of UCN-01 and perifosine in patients with relapsed and refractory acute leukemias and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Invest New Drugs 31:1217-27

Showing the most recent 10 out of 48 publications