The objective of this proposal is to quantify the role of PSA screening in US prostate cancer incidence and mortality trends. Prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the US have been declining since the early 1990s. The role of PSA screening in the recent trends is a subject of intense debate. Information on the efficacy of PSA testing from controlled clinical trials is lacking, and researchers and the public are divided about how much information about the test can be gleaned from the observed trends. To address the need for a quantitative approach to linking population PSA testing and prostate cancer trends, the first specific aim of this proposal is to develop a computer microsimulation model to project the impact of PSA screening on US prostate cancer incidence and mortality. The model will first project population prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the absence of PSA screening. The model will then superimpose dissemination of PSA screening and the modeled population trends will be compared with those observed. Recognizing that a major driving force behind any population effect of screening is the speed with which screening is adopted in the population, the second specific aim is to model the dissemination of PSA screening in the US. We will use the SEER- Medicare data to estimate annual PSA screening rates for older men. For younger men, we will use data from a case-control study of prostate cancer incidence that interviewed participants about their PSA screening histories. The estimates of PSA dissemination will be used as inputs to the computer model. Early detection of prostate cancer is affected not only by the extent of screening but also by the ability of the test to identify latent cancers. This depends on the growth of PSA in prostate cancer cases which has been estimated in several studies. Since these studies yield somewhat inconsistent results, the third specific aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of the data available regarding PSA growth in prostate cancer cases. The results of the meta-analysis will be used to inform the microsimulation model about PSA growth in men with prostate cancer.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project--Cooperative Agreements (U01)
Project #
3U01CA088160-04S1
Application #
6948633
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1)
Program Officer
Feuer, Eric J
Project Start
2000-09-01
Project End
2005-08-31
Budget Start
2003-09-01
Budget End
2005-08-31
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
2004
Total Cost
$72,660
Indirect Cost
Name
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
078200995
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98109
Broering, Jeanette M; Paciorek, Alan; Carroll, Peter R et al. (2014) Measurement equivalence using a mixed-mode approach to administer health-related quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 23:495-508
Pataky, Reka; Gulati, Roman; Etzioni, Ruth et al. (2014) Is prostate cancer screening cost-effective? A microsimulation model of prostate-specific antigen-based screening for British Columbia, Canada. Int J Cancer 135:939-47
Resnick, Matthew J; Guzzo, Thomas J; Cowan, Janet E et al. (2013) Factors associated with satisfaction with prostate cancer care: results from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE). BJU Int 111:213-20
Etzioni, Ruth; Gulati, Roman; Cooperberg, Matt R et al. (2013) Limitations of basing screening policies on screening trials: The US Preventive Services Task Force and Prostate Cancer Screening. Med Care 51:295-300
Cooperberg, Matthew R; Ramakrishna, Naren R; Duff, Steven B et al. (2013) Primary treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comprehensive lifetime cost-utility analysis. BJU Int 111:437-50
Glass, Allison S; Cowan, Janet E; Fuldeore, Mahesh J et al. (2013) Patient demographics, quality of life, and disease features of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: trends in the PSA era. Urology 82:60-5
Gulati, Roman; Gore, John L; Etzioni, Ruth (2013) Comparative effectiveness of alternative prostate-specific antigen--based prostate cancer screening strategies: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med 158:145-53
Gulati, Roman; Tsodikov, Alex; Wever, Elisabeth M et al. (2012) The impact of PLCO control arm contamination on perceived PSA screening efficacy. Cancer Causes Control 23:827-35
Zeliadt, Steven B; Buist, Diana S M; Reid, Robert J et al. (2012) Biopsy follow-up of prostate-specific antigen tests. Am J Prev Med 42:37-43
Choe, Kevin S; Cowan, Janet E; Chan, June M et al. (2012) Aspirin use and the risk of prostate cancer mortality in men treated with prostatectomy or radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30:3540-4

Showing the most recent 10 out of 34 publications