The Radiological Physics Center (RPC) was established in 1968 upon the recommendation of the Committee on Radiation Therapy Studies (CRTS), under the sponsorship of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) to insure the correctness and consistency of radiation dosimetry among institutions involved in interinstitutional clinical trials. This is accomplished ultimately by a review of the radiation therapy treatment records of patients entered onto interinstitutional clinical trials to verify that the treatment reported was in fact delivered and was in accord with the specifications of the clinical trial protocol. The RPC presently reviews the dosimetry aspects of individual patients' treatment records for patients entered on protocols of 6 clinical trial groups. The RPC also provides dosimetry data to 5 radiotherapy quality audit offices who review individual treatment records for patients entered on protocols of 8 clinical trial groups. The basic dosimetry data used in these reviews is obtained by a dosimetry review visit by an RPC physicist' to the participating institutions. Mailed dosimeters are evaluated on a periodic basis to identify potential errors and to assure the RPC that the institution has not modified its dosimetry practices since the last dosimetry review visit. When errors are discovered the RPC works with the institution to rectify the errors. Efforts are made to develop calculative methods and efficient techniques for measurements that are important to clinical trials. The RPC provides advice to the cooperative groups on quality assurance questions including assistance in drafting the radiotherapy portion of protocols.Experience gained in developing quality control procedures for one clinical trial is communicated to other clinical trial groups and to the radiological community. The RPC provides this quality assurance monitoring to all 11 cooperative groups presently funded by NCI and those groups that are phasing out their studies. Dosimetry monitoring is provided for external beam photon and electron therapy including stereotactic radiosurgery, and for intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy including high dose rate. There are presently 856 active U.S. institutions and 36 active in Canada and other foreign countries.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Cooperative Clinical Research--Cooperative Agreements (U10)
Project #
2U10CA010953-26
Application #
3555939
Study Section
Cancer Clinical Investigation Review Committee (CCI)
Project Start
1978-09-01
Project End
1996-07-31
Budget Start
1993-08-01
Budget End
1994-07-31
Support Year
26
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department
Type
Other Domestic Higher Education
DUNS #
001910777
City
Houston
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
77030
Kerns, James R; Stingo, Francesco; Followill, David S et al. (2017) Treatment Planning System Calculation Errors Are Present in Most Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston Phantom Failures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:1197-1203
Kry, Stephen F; Dromgoole, Lainy; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2017) Radiation Therapy Deficiencies Identified During On-Site Dosimetry Visits by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston Quality Assurance Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:1094-1100
Faught, Austin M; Davidson, Scott E; Fontenot, Jonas et al. (2017) Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool. Med Phys 44:4943-4951
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Followill, David S (2017) Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:750-756
Huang, Jessie Y; Followill, David S; Howell, Rebecca M et al. (2016) Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants. Med Phys 43:5117
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2016) Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:242-8
Davidson, Scott E; Cui, Jing; Kry, Stephen et al. (2016) Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys 43:4842
Scarboro, Sarah B; Cody, Dianna; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2015) Characterization of the nanoDot OSLD dosimeter in CT. Med Phys 42:1797-807
Huang, Jessie Y; Kerns, James R; Nute, Jessica L et al. (2015) An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol 60:1047-67
Pulliam, Kiley B; Huang, Jessie Y; Howell, Rebecca M et al. (2014) Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses. Med Phys 41:021710

Showing the most recent 10 out of 78 publications