We present qualifications in this application to justify continued participation in the Neonatal Network. They are as follows: Size: Few, if any, single nurseries can contribute a larger patient population for study. Expertise: We have an uncommonly rich and protracted experience in multicenter trials. Our scientific research and its publications are substantial; the diversity and depth of expert support personnel is noteworthy. Training Program: As a division of the Department of Pediatrics, Newborn Medicine is taught in accordance of residency requirements. We are approved for fellowship training in Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Administrative control: This large unit has been favored with considerable intramural control and institutional priority by virtue of its role in community health and its research activities. Facilities: Copious space, ample equipment and intramural control of a clinical laboratory with broad functions provide the wherewithal for effective clinical investigation. Perinatal Data System: We have compiled data manually since 1972, by computer since 1979. We have extensive data stored for the past 11 years, describing demographics, diagnoses, outcomes, procedures and therapies. Inborn admissions: Approximately 85% of admissions are inborn, and the number of back-transferred outborn infants is negligible, thereby increasing the number of babies available for study. Obstetrical coordination: The Neonatal Division is an official component of the Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology. Historically, our relationship with the obstetricians has been exemplary and productive. Fiscal efficiency: We are adept at budget management; neonatal network data indicate that our costs have been the lowest of all other participants.
| Ambalavanan, Namasivayam; Cotten, C Michael; Page, Grier P et al. (2015) Integrated genomic analyses in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr 166:531-7.e13 |
| Ment, Laura R; Ådén, Ulrika; Bauer, Charles R et al. (2015) Genes and environment in neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage. Semin Perinatol 39:592-603 |
| Adams-Chapman, Ira; Bann, Carla; Carter, Sheena L et al. (2015) Language outcomes among ELBW infants in early childhood. Early Hum Dev 91:373-9 |
| Stoll, Barbara J; Hansen, Nellie I; Bell, Edward F et al. (2015) Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 314:1039-51 |
| Patel, Ravi M; Kandefer, Sarah; Walsh, Michele C et al. (2015) Causes and timing of death in extremely premature infants from 2000 through 2011. N Engl J Med 372:331-40 |
| Wadhawan, R; Oh, W; Hintz, S R et al. (2014) Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation or surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. J Perinatol 34:64-70 |
| Morriss Jr, Frank H; Saha, Shampa; Bell, Edward F et al. (2014) Surgery and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low-birth-weight infants. JAMA Pediatr 168:746-54 |
| Maheshwari, Akhil; Schelonka, Robert L; Dimmitt, Reed A et al. (2014) Cytokines associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. Pediatr Res 76:100-8 |
| Hartnett, M Elizabeth; Morrison, Margaux A; Smith, Silvia et al. (2014) Genetic variants associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:6194-203 |
| Kelleher, John; Salas, Ariel A; Bhat, Ramachandra et al. (2014) Prophylactic indomethacin and intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 134:e1369-77 |
Showing the most recent 10 out of 102 publications
