D.6. Program EvaluationEvaluation of the program will be a regular function of both the ISC and the EAC. The Scientific Advisorappointed by NCCAM will work very closely with the PI to develop specific evaluation plans, and to assess thevalue and integrity of the evaluation on an ongoing basis. Based on regular investigator reports to the PI, theminutes of ISC meetings, and on site visits, the PI and the Scientific Advisor, along with selected members ofthe ISC, will assess aspects of each research project and Core involvement. Points of departure will begin withthe planning process that each project will undergo if an award is made, and proceed with each step.Currently, project progress records are kept in a project database at PCCR and reviewed quarterly. Phasesrecorded are: planning, pilot testing, data collection, data analysis/interpretation, report writing, and manuscriptsubmission. We will add a category entitled, 'grant application development. Each year, a formal report will beprepared at the behest of the ISC, describing the progress and results of each project. This report will beattractive enough and appropriate in content to share with interested outside audiences. It will be developed inconsultation with the EAC and Scientific Advisor.The Research Administrator will prepare and maintain formal subcontract arrangements with eachcollaborating institution. She receives monthly budget reports and is required to verify expenditures with eachCo or Core leader.
Showing the most recent 10 out of 14 publications
