Our goal remains the same as put forth in our original proposal, i.e., to capitalize on the infrastructure and strengths of the existing national quality assurance (QA) programs, including the Image-Guided Therapy Center (ITC) (previously referred to as the 3DQA Center in the original grant), Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC), Radiological Physics Center (RPC), and the, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group(RTOG) to create an Advanced Technology Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials Support (ATC) QA consortium. Our ATC QA consortium approach will avoid duplication of these already defined programs, while strengthening interactions between QA groups which promote the development of common QA for advanced technology clinical trials throughout all participating Cooperative Groups. Specifically, we will (1) provide and/or facilitate QA review of RTOG clinical trials that utilize advanced technologies including, but not limited to, three-dimensional radiation therapy treatment planning and delivery(3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiosurgery/radiation therapy, and brachytherapy;(2)assist(facilitate receipt of digital data) QARC in their QA review of cooperative group clinical trials that utilize advanced technologies;(3) assist (facilitate receipt of digital data) RPC in their QA review of cooperative group clinical trials that utilize advanced technologies; (4) develop Monte Carlo simulation capability (through a subcontract with Fox Chase Cancer Center) for the purpose of credentialing and QA pertaining to clinical trials utilizing advanced technologies;(5) develop QA and credentialing criteria that is compatible with the level of complexity of the clinical trial treatment regimens;(6) create mechanisms and software tools to facilitate QA reviews of treatment planning and verification(TPV) data submitted by institutions participating in cooperative group clinical trials (both pediatric and adult) that utilize advanced technologies. Emphasis will be on the development and improvement of web-based remote-review tools that allow for the efficient review of centrally-located image-based data by reviewers not co-located with the data; (7) develop efficient methodologies for electronic data exchange of TPV data between the ITC and the participating institutions, remotely located QA review group(s), and Cooperative Group?s Operations, Statistics, and Data Management Group(s); (8) develop and maintain an archival TPV database that can be linked with the Cooperative Group?s clinical outcomes database; (9) construct normal tissue complication probability(NTCP) models to demonstrate use of TPV database, and (10) serve as a resource to the nation?s Cooperative Groups and participating institutions for support of advanced technology radiation therapy dinical trials.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Resource-Related Research Projects--Cooperative Agreements (U24)
Project #
3U24CA081647-04S1
Application #
6662241
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1 (M2))
Program Officer
Deye, James
Project Start
2001-07-22
Project End
2007-06-30
Budget Start
2002-09-19
Budget End
2003-06-30
Support Year
4
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
$50,000
Indirect Cost
Name
Washington University
Department
Radiation-Diagnostic/Oncology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
062761671
City
Saint Louis
State
MO
Country
United States
Zip Code
63130
Michalski, Jeff M; Moughan, Jennifer; Purdy, James et al. (2018) Effect of Standard vs Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0126 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 4:e180039
Faught, Austin M; Davidson, Scott E; Fontenot, Jonas et al. (2017) Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool. Med Phys 44:4943-4951
Olsen, Jeffrey R; Moughan, Jennifer; Myerson, Robert et al. (2017) Predictors of Radiation Therapy-Related Gastrointestinal Toxicity From Anal Cancer Dose-Painted Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Secondary Analysis of NRG Oncology RTOG 0529. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:400-408
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Followill, David S (2017) Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:750-756
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2016) Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:242-8
Davidson, Scott E; Cui, Jing; Kry, Stephen et al. (2016) Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys 43:4842
Baumann, Brian C; Bosch, Walter R; Bahl, Amit et al. (2016) Development and Validation of Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 96:78-86
Lee, W Robert; Dignam, James J; Amin, Mahul B et al. (2016) Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:2325-32
Bradley, Jeffrey D; Paulus, Rebecca; Komaki, Ritsuko et al. (2015) Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial p Lancet Oncol 16:187-99
Hong, Theodore S; Moughan, Jennifer; Garofalo, Michael C et al. (2015) NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0822: A Phase 2 Study of Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Combination With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93:29-36

Showing the most recent 10 out of 85 publications