The overall goal of the expanded Parkland-UT Southwestern PROSPR Center is to optimize cervical and colon cancer screening in our integrated safety-net system. The population we contribute is the most diverse and disadvantaged in the PROSPR network, representing patients infrequently included in large scale research networks. Parkland's cervical cancer screen-eligible population of more than 78,000 adult women is 6 1% Hispanic, 24% African American, and 8% Non-Hispanic White. All are low-income and few have private insurance leading them to rely on public insurance or charity care. Thus, our patients represent the """"""""traditionally underserved"""""""" groups experiencing cervical cancer disparities - higher incidence and mortality, and lower screening and HPV vaccination. Parkland delivers the full cervical cancer screening process (risk assessment, early detection, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment) through an integrated system of 11 neighborhood-based primary care clinics, 11 women's health centers, and specialty clinics (dysplasia, gynecology and oncology). All clinics share a comprehensive electronic medical record (EMR) through which eligibility for a test, test ordering, results, referrals, and treatmentis ascertainable electronically. Our Center will expand by adding a Cervical Screening Process Documentation Unit (SPDU) and a Cervical Research Core. The Cervical SPDU will: 1) harness Parkland's EMR to collect accurate data on the cervical cancer screening process at multiple levels including the patient, provider, clinic, system, and health policy, and 2) securely transfer de-identified data to the Statistical Coordinating Center, investigators in the Cervical Research Core will provide intellectual leadership to the PROSPR network by prioritizing, conceptualizing, and conducting collaborative projects that capitalize on the heterogeneity of the network with respect to patient population, health system, and context. Data contributed by the Parkland-UT Southwestern PROSPR Center to the Network will enable analyses that examine how recent changes in guidelines and newly available screening and vaccine technologies impact long-standing disparities in cervical cancer. This research will improve both the science and delivery of effective cervical cancer screening.

Public Health Relevance

Assessing effectiveness of cervical cancer screening in safety-net settings is important because urban, uninsured, low SES minorities have higher incidence and mortality rates. The PROSPR network needs multilevel data on this underserved population to discover what can be done to impact disparities.

National Institute of Health (NIH)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRLB-B (M2))
Program Officer
Parker, Tonya
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
University of Texas Sw Medical Center Dallas
Other Clinical Sciences
Schools of Medicine
United States
Zip Code
Lee, Simon J Craddock; Inrig, Stephen J; Balasubramanian, Bijal A et al. (2018) Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion. Prev Med Rep 9:138-143
Hughes, Amy E; Tiro, Jasmin A; Balasubramanian, Bijal A et al. (2018) Social Disadvantage, Healthcare Utilization, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Leveraging Longitudinal Patient Address and Health Records Data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:1424-1432
Pruitt, Sandi L; Werner, Claudia L; Borton, Eric K et al. (2018) Cervical Cancer Burden and Opportunities for Prevention in a Safety-Net Healthcare System. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 27:1398-1406
Murphy, Caitlin C; Sigel, Bianca M; Yang, Edward et al. (2018) Adherence to colorectal cancer screening measured as the proportion of time covered. Gastrointest Endosc 88:323-331.e2
Smith, Lauren N; Makam, Anil N; Darden, Douglas et al. (2018) Acute Myocardial Infarction Readmission Risk Prediction Models: A Systematic Review of Model Performance. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 11:e003885
Chubak, Jessica; McLerran, Dale; Zheng, Yingye et al. (2018) Receipt of Colonoscopy Following Diagnosis of Advanced Adenomas: An Analysis within Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev :
Barnes, Arti; Betts, Andrea C; Borton, Eric K et al. (2018) Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women in an urban, United States safety-net healthcare system. AIDS 32:1861-1870
Martin, Jason; Halm, Ethan A; Tiro, Jasmin A et al. (2017) Reasons for Lack of Diagnostic Colonoscopy After Positive Result on Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Safety-Net Health System. Am J Med 130:93.e1-93.e7
Balasubramanian, Bijal A; Garcia, Michael P; Corley, Douglas A et al. (2017) Racial/ethnic differences in obesity and comorbidities between safety-net- and non safety-net integrated health systems. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6326
Skinner, Celette Sugg; Ahn, Chul; Halm, Ethan A et al. (2017) Recommendation of colorectal cancer testing among primary care patients younger than 50 with elevated risk. Prev Med 102:20-23

Showing the most recent 10 out of 40 publications