Innovative strategies for tobacco control must be considered. Currently, there are 44 million smokers in the US and 1.2 billion smokers world-wide. Unless there is a dramatic change in the trends, by year 2020, it is anticipated that 7 million smokers will die per year world-wide from tobacco-caused diseases. One approach that has the potential to have significant impact in reducing tobacco-related mortality and morbidity is reducing the nicotine content in cigarettes to levels that are non-addictive. Experimenters of cigarette smoking would have a reduced risk of becoming dependent and dependent smokers would have a greater chance to become smoke-free. Although this measure has been considered as technically feasible, many research gaps need to be addressed before considering nicotine reduction as a policy measure. The goals of this proposal is to address some of the key research gaps including: 1) the best strategy for nicotine reduction (immediate reduction to very low nicotine cigarettes versus gradual reduction in nicotine content of cigarettes), 2) effects of these strategies over time;and 3) identification of factors that may moderate responses to reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes. Smokers will be randomized to three different experimental conditions: 1) very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes with a 0.06 mg nicotine yield (actual dose to be determined by Project 2;N=200);2) gradual reduction in nicotine content cigarettes (.8 mg, .6 mg, .4 mg, .2 mg and 0.06 mg yield cigarettes, each smoked for a period of 4 weeks, N=200);and 3) usual brand cigarettes as a control group (N=100). Over the 20-week experimental phase, subjects will be assessed for pattern of tobacco use, biomarkers of exposure and effect, subjective responses (e.g., satisfaction, craving withdrawal symptoms), cognitive performance and smoking topography. At the end of the experimental phase, they will be followed for another 4 weeks to assess abstinence from all tobacco products and smoking rate. The results from this study will describe the possible risks and benefits of two approaches for reducing nicotine in cigarettes and help inform future research in this area. This project will complement and use similar measures as Projects 2 and 3.

Public Health Relevance

The goals of this proposal is to address some of the key research gaps including: 1) the best strategy for nicotine reduction (immediate reduction to very low nicotine cigarettes versus gradual reduction in nicotine content of cigarettes), 2) effects of these strategies over time;and 3) identification of factors that may moderate responses to reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Specialized Center--Cooperative Agreements (U54)
Project #
1U54DA031659-01
Application #
8153487
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZDA1-EXL-T (01))
Project Start
2011-09-15
Project End
2016-08-31
Budget Start
2011-09-15
Budget End
2012-11-30
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$233,761
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pittsburgh
Department
Type
DUNS #
004514360
City
Pittsburgh
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
15213
Boatman, Jeffrey A; Vock, David M; Koopmeiners, Joseph S et al. (2018) Estimating causal effects from a randomized clinical trial when noncompliance is measured with error. Biostatistics 19:103-118
Hatsukami, Dorothy K; Donny, Eric C (2018) The Debate About Nicotine Addiction and the Role of Medicinal Products: Commentary on Zeller. Nicotine Tob Res :
Smith, Tracy T; Hatsukami, Dorothy K; Benowitz, Neal L et al. (2018) Whether to push or pull? Nicotine reduction and non-combusted alternatives - Two strategies for reducing smoking and improving public health. Prev Med 117:8-14
Dermody, Sarah S; McClernon, F Joseph; Benowitz, Neal et al. (2018) Effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes on individual withdrawal symptoms over time and during abstinence. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 26:223-232
Tidey, Jennifer W; Davis, Danielle R; Miller, Mollie E et al. (2018) Modeling nicotine regulation: A review of studies in smokers with mental health conditions. Prev Med 117:30-37
Ho, Yen-Yi; Nhu Vo, Tien; Chu, Haitao et al. (2018) A Bayesian hierarchical model for demand curve analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 27:2038-2049
Streck, Joanna M; Bergeria, Cecilia L; Parker, Maria A et al. (2018) Response to reduced nicotine content cigarettes among smokers with chronic health conditions. Prev Med Rep 12:321-329
Pacek, Lauren R; Joseph McClernon, F; Denlinger-Apte, Rachel L et al. (2018) Perceived nicotine content of reduced nicotine content cigarettes is a correlate of perceived health risks. Tob Control 27:420-426
Cassidy, Rachel N; Tidey, Jennifer W; Cao, Qing et al. (2018) Age Moderates Smokers' Subjective Response to Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Nicotine Tob Res :
Villanti, Andrea C; Gaalema, Diann E; Tidey, Jennifer W et al. (2018) Co-occurring vulnerabilities and menthol use in U.S. young adult cigarette smokers: Findings from Wave 1 of the PATH Study, 2013-2014. Prev Med 117:43-51

Showing the most recent 10 out of 63 publications